TRANSITION FROM KALI YUGA TO SATHYA YUGA

DISCIPLINE THAT SEEKS TO UNIFY THE SEVERAL EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HUMAN NATURE IN AN EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND INDIVIDUALS AS BOTH CREATURES OF THEIR ENVIRONMENT AND CREATORS OF THEIR OWN VALUES


THE WORLD ALWAYS INVISIBLY AND DANGEROUSLY REVOLVES AROUND PHILOSOPHERS

THE USE OF KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

OLDER IS THE PLEASURE IN THE HERD THAN THE PLEASURE IN THE EGO: AND AS LONG AS THE GOOD CONSCIENCE IS FOR THE HERD, THE BAD CONSCIENCE ONLY SAITH: EGO.

VERILY, THE CRAFTY EGO, THE LOVELESS ONE, THAT SEEKETH ITS ADVANTAGE IN THE ADVANTAGE OF MANY — IT IS NOT THE ORIGIN OF THE HERD, BUT ITS RUIN.

LOVING ONES, WAS IT ALWAYS, AND CREATING ONES, THAT CREATED GOOD AND BAD. FIRE OF LOVE GLOWETH IN THE NAMES OF ALL THE VIRTUES, AND FIRE OF WRATH.

METAMATRIX - BEYOND DECEPTION

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Africa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Africa. Show all posts

26 July 2023

Panic in DC

War has always been one of the cabal’s biggest money makers, and it made Al Waleed bin Talal Al Saud one of the wealthiest men in the world, if not the wealthiest.

Trump became a wartime president the day he was sworn in and has been waging war against a global cabal ever since. But I believe he will ultimately go down in history not only as our greatest president, but also one of the greatest peacemaker’s of all time.

Q post #4724:

He wasn’t a puppet and wasn’t controlled by anybody. He recognized not only how the game was played in the Middle East, but who the real enemy was. He knew that the hidden enemy was Al Waleed, not his puppets. Trump removed Al Waleed from the chessboard first, then killed Qasem Soleimani, who was his biggest puppet in the Middle East. Everything was centered around Iran because that’s who was funding all the terrorists and giving them weapons and training.

Weren’t they under sanctions and not allowed to participate in the global financial system because of their support for global terrorism? Their oil supplies were being sanctioned. Soleimani and his Quds force, along with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard were all designated as terrorists and sanctioned too.

How were they funding all the terrorists they controlled?

Iran was Al Waleed’s most important proxy state in the Middle East. All roads of corruption tied to Al Waleed lead back to Iran. It was at the center of terrorism and wars, but it was involved in so much more.

A quote from one of Trump’s favorite books: The Art of War:

Two things happened at the end of the Obama administration that have opened the door to exposing it all:

1. Pallets of cash.

2. The Iran nuclear deal.

They are both linked, but not in the way the media portrayed them at the time. In this article, I want to focus on the pallets of cash because money is the keystone to revealing everything.

As Q said, “follow the money.”

Here’s a portion of a great Q post that gives a huge clue and connects some dots.

Q post 430, Dec 22, 2017:

Clowns are what Q calls the CIA. This drop is all about the CIA.

Who controls North Korea?

The media has told us for a long time that China controlled North Korea. They told us North Korea was just their little puppet. But who ‘really’ controlled North Korea? How did they get their weapons of mass destruction?

North Korea was a puppet of the CIA, who provided them with the technology and money to produce nuclear weapons. John Brennan lied to the incoming Trump administration on the intel of both North Korea and Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

The Iran nuclear deal will help expose it all, but I will leave that important story for a coming article.

I want to focus on the other part of this post that is also directly connected to the CIA.

Why is IRAN protected? Why is IRAN FUNDED by the US? What news about IRAN broke? Drugs?

The CIA has been involved in drug trafficking for a long time. It’s been well documented, but the media almost never talks about it.

But it’s so much worse than most people know.

Here’s the first media lie that has been pushed from the beginning of this story:

‘The pallets of cash were part of the Iran nuclear deal.’

Have you heard of the term ‘red herring?’

Here’s the red herring that was the second media lie and was argued about on both sides in order to distract from the truth:

The pallets of cash were a ‘ransom payment for hostages.’

That lie was meant to garner sympathy from democrat supporters because even they won’t support funding terrorism.

Those pallets of cash in foreign currencies were flown on unmarked planes in the middle of the night and nobody was supposed to ever know about it.

As Trump loves to say, “They got caught.”

Speaking of Trump, he’s quoted in a Q post on this subject:

Not a single investigation, just a lot of pundits in the media talking about a ransom payment for hostages as a distraction.

According to the Investor’s Business Daily:

Iran: One of the linchpins of former President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran was that it would be accompanied by a near-ban on Iran having any access to the U.S. banking system. A new congressional report says that, too, was a lie.

Obama and his officials at the Treasury Department and State Department were clear: They would work assiduously to freeze out Iran from getting dollars to fund its mischief and mayhem around the world.

Obama sent a clear message to Congress: If you don't block this nuclear deal, we will bar Iran's access to our financial system. The deal was clear, unequivocal.

It was also a lie. Obama lied, and so did others in his administration.

That's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros.

It required a special license by the U.S. Treasury, which was granted in February of 2016. But it was never disclosed, either to Congress or the American people.

Apart from the lie, which is bad enough for an administration that claimed repeatedly to be "scandal-free," this money did not have innocuous uses. Far from it.

Our own State Department characterizes Iran as the No. 1 terrorist-supporting state on Earth. Every dollar it gets from us has an ultimate use that is highly questionable, which is the reason why the U.S. imposed sanctions in the first place.

Why was cash so important? Why was it not in US dollars, but instead given to Iran in other foreign currencies?

The entire global financial system is controlled by the dollar. Iran was designated a state sponsor of terrorism.

So was Soleimani, the Quds Force, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, Hezbollah and Hamas. That made it illegal for banks to do transactions with them or companies associated with them. Giving them foreign currencies was all about getting around the sanctions. Obama funded terrorism and ‘got caught.’

Remember, this was a secret mission to fly cash under the radar to Iran that was exposed, and Obama was now reacting to that exposure. We learned about the cash payments after they happened. It was leaked by ‘Ghosts in the machine,’ in my opinion.

Here’s a Q post talking about it and tying it directly to the CIA and North Korea that was posted just days before Al Waleed’s arrest:

The CIA controlled both North Korea and Iran. It took several planes to haul the amount of cash in the middle of the night into Iran under the cover of darkness. It wasn’t just to fund terrorism, but to also secretly fund the CIA who was promoting the terrorists in order to start wars.

The CIA controlled the whole operation; it was completely separate from the Iran nuclear deal, even though the Obama administration and all the media told us it was all related.

Part of another relevant Q post #1948, Aug 28, 2018:

Trump knows not only that this was a CIA operation completely separate from the Iran nuclear deal, but he also knows all the details. He knows how many planes, where they landed and at what time. He knows how the cash was divided and who it was going to. He knows they were trying to avoid wire transfer logs and keep all of Congress in the dark, along with hiding it under foreign aid through Europe, which was a way to get around the law against funding terrorism.

Don’t miss that last line in this post.

That would be the NSA (military intelligence).

We have it all!

According to The Washington Times:

The U.S. government has traced some of the $1.7 billion released to Iran by the Obama administration to Iranian-backed terrorists in the two years since the cash was transferred.

According to knowledgeable sources, Iran has used the funds to pay its main proxy, the Lebanon-based terrorist group Hezbollah, along with the Quds Force, Iran’s main foreign intelligence and covert action arm and element of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The U.S. money supplied to Iran as part of an arms settlement dating back to the 1970s also has been traced to Iran’s backing of Houthi rebels seeking to take power in Yemen. Iran has been supporting the Yemen rebels as part of a bid to encircle and eventually take control of Saudi Arabia.

“The enormous financial windfall the Iranian regime received because of the deal — access to more than $100 billion, including $1.8 billion in cash — has not been used to better the lives of the Iranian people,” Mr. Trump said Jan. 12. “Instead, it has served as a slush fund for weapons, terror, and oppression, and to further line the pockets of corrupt regime leaders.”

Mr. Trump said the United States is countering Iranian proxy wars in Yemen and Syria and cutting the regime’s money flows to terrorists.

“We have sanctioned nearly 100 individuals and entities involved with the Iranian regime’s ballistic missile program and its other illicit activities,” he said.

Do you want more evidence that this wasn’t about the Iran nuclear deal, but was instead a secret CIA operation?

According to CBS News:

The Obama administration said Wednesday it paid $1.3 billion in interest to Iran in January to resolve a decades-old dispute over an undelivered military sale, two days after allowing $400 million in cash to fly to Tehran.

State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau says the U.S. couldn’t say more about the Jan. 19 payments because of diplomatic sensitivities. They involved 13 separate payments of $99,999,999.99 and final payment of about $10 million. There was no explanation for the Treasury Department keeping the individual transactions under $100 million.

It’s important to know the context of this news story. The payments in foreign cash totaling $1.7 billion had been delivered secretly to Iran back in January of 2016 and we were just hearing about it in August of the same year.

Why were the 13 separate payments just one penny under $100 million dollars? Clearly to avoid a red flag trigger which would have notified Congress or other government agencies.

More from the same CBS News report:

The money settles a dispute over a $400 million payment made in the 1970s by the U.S.-backed shah’s government for military equipment. The equipment was never delivered because of the 1979 Islamic Revolution that overthrew the shah and ended diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Iran.

Republican critics accuse the administration of paying a “ransom​.”

President Barack Obama and other officials deny such claims, though they’ve struggled to explain why the U.S. paid in cash. President Obama said it was because the United States and Iran didn’t have a banking relationship after years of nuclear-related sanctions, but that wouldn’t rule out using intermediary banks that maintain relationship with both.

There was absolutely no reason to give the chief sponsor of terrorism in the world $1.7 billion in cash and even CBS News said Obama was having a hard time explaining that.

More from the CBS News article:

The money came from a little-known fund administered by the Treasury Department for settling litigation claims. The so-called Judgment Fund is taxpayer money Congress has permanently approved in the event it’s needed, allowing the president to bypass direct congressional approval to make a settlement. The U.S. previously paid out $278 million in Iran-related claims by using the fund in 1991.

That’s a key data point connecting a lot of things.

Obama used tax payer money to fund terrorists through the Judgment Fund, a fund set up for litigation purposes.

Litigation where?

The International Court of Justice.

From Wikipedia:

The lie of $400 million for hostages didn’t explain the $1.3 billion in payments that happened “after” the hostages were released, so Obama came up with a new lie that we owed the money from a past weapons deal with Iran.

Here’s where it gets really interesting.

You see, the enemy keeps using the same playbook over the years because it’s been successfully deployed in the past.

Who was president in 1991, the last time the US government gave Iran a lot of cash and used the same Judgement Fund to do it?

None other than President H.W. Bush, our 41st president, who just happened to have been a member of the CIA and headed the agency before becoming president Ronald Reagan’s Vice President.

According to the New York Times:

The Bush Administration is eager to resolve financial disputes with Iran to improve relations in the post-Khomeini era and possibly pave the way for the release of American hostages in Lebanon, senior Administration officials said today.

At a news conference today, President Bush noted that Iran and the United States still owed each other money and said, ''I'd like to get this underbrush cleaned out now.''

Mr. Bush's comments came a day after American officials disclosed that Iran and the United States had worked out an arrangement by which Iran would receive $567 million from one account, a portion of the money frozen in Washington after Iranians stormed the United States Embassy in Tehran in 1979. The United States would keep the balance of the account, $243 million, as part of a larger pool of money to be used against further American claims.

The decision to return much of Iran's frozen funds follows unannounced talks last week between Iranian officials and Abraham D. Sofaer, the State Department's legal adviser, at a special American-Iranian claims tribunal in The Hague.

One indication of the Administration’s eagerness in paying back the money is that it did not wait for the independent tribunal to rule against the United States, as it has in the past, but dispatched Mr. Sofaer to speed the process.

In addition to the financial assets in dispute, Iran has filed a $12 billion claim against the United States for military equipment and spare parts that Iran says were paid for and not delivered. American officials say the United States is holding only a fraction of that amount.

Cash paid to Iran out of the Judgment Fund because of a supposed looming loss at the International Court of Justice, with both having American hostages involved?

Obama used that last part of the story to explain why he had paid Iran another $1.3 billion in cash.

‘It was just money that we already owed Iran for a weapons deal never completed back when the Shah of Iran was removed from power by the current regime.’

Obama wanted everyone to believe that we were going to lose that case before the international court anyway, so we needed to pay it.

Here’s a revealing article on the international court after Iran sued the Trump administration for pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal and putting even more sanctions on Iran.

According to Reuters:

THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Iranian lawyers asked the International Court of Justice on Monday to order the United States to lift sanctions imposed by the Trump administration against Tehran, but Washington described the suit as meritless.

At the start of a week of hearings in The Hague, the court’s president asked the United States to respect the outcome of the case that Iran filed in July. During their decades of animosity, both countries have ignored some rulings at the court.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo described Iran’s suit as “an attempt to interfere with the sovereign rights of the United States to take lawful actions, including re-imposition of sanctions, which are necessary to protect our national security.”

The ICJ is the United Nations tribunal for resolving international disputes. Its rulings are binding, but it has no power to enforce them.

The United States and Iran have clashed at the court in the past since they became enemies after Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Iran ignored a 1980 U.S. suit at the ICJ over the seizure of American diplomats in Tehran, which the court found to be illegal.

Both countries have ignored the court’s rulings in the past. Why?

The International Court has no power to enforce its rulings.

There was literally nothing that could have forced either President Bush or Obama to pay Iran anything considering they were not just our enemy, but also the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world.

It was just another Obama lie to hide the real reason for the secret CIA operation that was funding terrorism.

But let’s circle back to the beginning.

Why is IRAN protected? Why is IRAN FUNDED by the US? What news about IRAN broke? Drugs?

It’s far worse than most people can imagine.

According to The Begin-Sadat Center For Strategic Studies:

When it comes to business connections, Hezbollah is “the Gambinos on steroids,” said a former DEA official, referring to the infamous American crime family. Other criminal organizations are adept at producing drugs, running protection rackets, and monopolizing illicit businesses, but they lack global networks for shipping and distributing goods and laundering the proceeds. That is where Hezbollah comes in, along with its willing collaborators in various Lebanese diaspora communities around the world. Do you need five tons of cocaine delivered to Antwerp? To launder the cash back to Colombia? To process phantom transactions from Vietnam to Venezuela through money exchange houses? Hezbollah can provide those services, and its ability to do so is what keeps it afloat.

The effectiveness of Hezbollah’s laundromat depends on its direct, well-documented involvement in the drug trade.

American law enforcement discovered Hezbollah’s drug activity by chance in 2006, when Colombian wiretaps monitoring a Medellin- based drug cartel known as the Oficina del Envigado picked up conversations in Arabic. The DEA brought in a translator who explained that Hezbollah was arranging multi-ton shipments of cocaine to the Middle East. In the ensuing investigation, codenamed Operation Titan (originally launched in 2004 to target the Oficina), the DEA opened a Pandora’s Box. This led to Project Cassandra, a decade-long operation launched in 2007 that sought to stop Hezbollah from trafficking drugs into the US and Europe.

Cassandra’s key finding was that Hezbollah’s shipments of cocaine were not a small sideshow by loosely affiliated individuals but a multibillion dollar, worldwide operation orchestrated by top officials within Hezbollah’s inner circle.

Hezbollah has been trafficking illegal drugs globally for years to fund terrorism. Our DEA accidentally discovered this massive operation back in 2006 during the presidency of George W. Bush. The truth is, it had been happening going back to the 1980’s when his father, president H.W. Bush had helped get them established in the drug trade in Latin America.

Operation Cassandra was launched in 2007, and it was so massive that it was going on throughout the Obama administration.

According to Politico:

(Reader note: all references to Politico are from this same article unless notified. It’s a three-part series, and I would encourage you to hit the link and read this entire article.)

The campaign, dubbed Project Cassandra, was launched in 2008 after the Drug Enforcement Administration amassed evidence that Hezbollah had transformed itself from a Middle East-focused military and political organization into an international crime syndicate that some investigators believed was collecting $1 billion a year from drug and weapons trafficking, money laundering and other criminal activities.

Over the next eight years, agents working out of a top-secret DEA facility in Chantilly, Virginia, used wiretaps, undercover operations and informants to map Hezbollah’s illicit networks, with the help of 30 U.S. and foreign security agencies.

They followed cocaine shipments, some from Latin America to West Africa and on to Europe and the Middle East, and others through Venezuela and Mexico to the United States. They tracked the river of dirty cash as it was laundered by, among other tactics, buying American used cars and shipping them to Africa. And with the help of some key cooperating witnesses, the agents traced the conspiracy, they believed, to the innermost circle of Hezbollah and its state sponsors in Iran.

We’ll come back to that huge story.

This was a massive criminal enterprise that had been operating under the radar for a long time. It had grown into a lot more than just drug trafficking. But the Obama administration was doing everything they could to hinder the investigation.

More from the Politico article:

But as Project Cassandra reached higher into the hierarchy of the conspiracy, Obama administration officials threw an increasingly insurmountable series of roadblocks in its way, according to interviews with dozens of participants who in many cases spoke for the first time about events shrouded in secrecy, and a review of government documents and court records.

The Justice Department declined requests by Project Cassandra and other authorities to file criminal charges against major players such as Hezbollah’s high-profile envoy to Iran, a Lebanese bank that allegedly laundered billions in alleged drug profits, and a central player in a U.S.-based cell of the Iranian paramilitary Quds Force. And the State Department rejected requests to lure high-value targets to countries where they could be arrested.

There was a key figure in the Obama administration that was protecting Hezbollah from the criminal investigation.

More from Politico:

Obama had entered office in 2009 promising to improve relations with Iran as part of a broader rapprochement with the Muslim world.

The man who would become Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser and then CIA director, John Brennan, went further. He recommended in a policy paper that “the next president has the opportunity to set a new course for relations between the two countries” through not only a direct dialogue, but “greater assimilation of Hezbollah into Lebanon’s political system.”

Hezbollah is a very interesting organization,” Brennan told a Washington conference, saying it had evolved from “purely a terrorist organization” to a militia and, ultimately, a political party with representatives in the Lebanese Parliament and Cabinet, according to a Reuters report.

In practice, the administration’s willingness to envision a new role for Hezbollah in the Middle East, combined with its desire for a negotiated settlement to Iran’s nuclear program, translated into a reluctance to move aggressively against the top Hezbollah operatives, according to Project Cassandra members and others.

The Obama administration was doing everything they could to block the Hezbollah investigation. Hezbollah was nicknamed ‘The Laundromat’ for a reason. They were laundering money through so many different things, but there was one way that caught the investigators by surprise.

The man doing it was one of the top Hezbollah leaders.

More from the Politico article:

But it was Safieddine, a low-key, bespectacled man with a diplomatic bearing, who was their key point of connection from his base in Tehran, investigators believed.

The Colombia and Venezuela investigations linked him to numerous international drug smuggling and money laundering networks, and especially to one of the biggest the DEA had ever seen, led by Medellin-based Lebanese businessman Ayman Joumaa.

Joumaa’s network rang alarm bells in Washington when agents discovered he was working with Mexico’s brutal Los Zetas cartel to move multi-ton loads of cocaine directly into the United States, and washing $200 million a month in criminal proceeds with the help of 300 or so used car dealerships. The network would funnel huge amounts of money to the dealerships to purchase used cars, which would then be shipped to Benin, on Africa’s west coast.

Here’s a picture of those huge car lots in Africa and how much it has expanded over the years.

They were laundering $200 million dollars a month through approximately 300 car dealerships in America. It was connected to the deadly Los Zetas cartel in Mexico. (More on them in my next article)

Do you remember the ‘red herring’arguments that were used as a distraction in the media?

 1. It would help the struggling economy.

2. It would help reduce emissions effecting climate change.

3. It would give the automaker’s another bailout.

While the whole country debated for months on whether or not those three reasons were worth the $2 billion in tax payer money doled out to increase car sales, it was all a perfect distraction.

According to another article from Politico:

While over 650,000 clunkers were traded in, consumers only bought 380,000 vehicles they wouldn’t have otherwise purchased, the researchers conclude.

NADA said this ignores other car sales generated by interest in the clunkers program, and that dealers — whose lots were empty only months earlier — typically sold two cars outside the clunkers program for every clunker-eligible vehicle purchased.

Cash for Clunkers “provided a dramatic boost to auto manufacturing production and retail sales by bringing in more than 900,000 customers to automotive showrooms and generating record vehicle sales increases,” Wood said, adding that an automotive research group’s study found only 4 percent of participants in the Clunkers program would’ve purchased or leased a car without the extra incentive.

What better way to massively increase the size of Hezbollah’s Laundromat, than to offer $2 billion in tax payer money as an incentive to trade in your used car for a new one?

If Hezbollah is purchasing $200 million dollars worth of used cars a month and shipping them to Africa to sell so they can launder drug money, how do you hide the huge shortage of used cars available for purchase in America?

The used car that was traded in had to be destroyed to reduce emissions. Do you really think all those used cars got destroyed? I’m willing to bet that about 300 used car dealerships with connections to Hezbollah were busy buying as many of those vehicles they could get their hands on.

The perfect distraction.

Now you know the real purpose behind ‘Cash for Clunkers’.

Jul 19, 2023
 

28 May 2015

Researchers discover a 2 billion year old Nuclear Reactor in Africa

May 28, 2015 - In 1972, a worker at a nuclear fuel processing plant noticed something suspicious in a routine analysis of uranium obtained from a normal mineral source from Africa. As is the case with all natural uranium, the material under study contained three isotopos- ie three forms with different atomic masses: uranium 238, the most abundant variety; uranium 234, the rarest; and uranium 235, the isotope that is coveted because it can sustain a nuclear chain reaction. For weeks, specialists at the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) remained perplexed.

Elsewhere in the earth’s crust, on the moon and even in meteorites, we can find uranium 235 atoms that makes up only 0.720 percent of the total. But in the samples that were analyzed, which came from the Oklo deposit in Gabon, a former French colony in West Africa, the uranium 235 constituted only 0.717 percent. That small difference was enough to alert French scientists that there was something very strange going on with the minerals. These small details led to further investigations which showed that least a part of the mine was well below the normal amount of uranium 235: some 200 kilograms appeared to have been extracted in the distant past, today, that amount is enough to make half a dozen nuclear bombs. Soon, researchers and scientists from all over the world gathered in Gabon to explore what was going on with the Uranium from Oklo.



What was fund in Oklo surprised everyone gathered there, the site where the uranium originated from is actually an advanced subterranean nuclear reactor that goes well beyond the capabilities of our present scientific knowledge. Researchers believe that this ancient nuclear reactor is around 1.8 billion years old and operated for at least 500,000 years in the distant past. Scientists performed several other investigation at the uranium mine and the results were made public at a conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency. According to News agencies from Africa, researchers had found traces of fission products and fuel wastes at various locations within the mine area.

Incredibly, compared with this huge nuclear reactor, our modern-day nuclear reactors are really not comparable both in design and functionality. According to studies, this ancient nuclear reactor was several kilometers long. Interestingly, for a large nuclear reactor like this, thermal impact towards the environment was limited to just 40 meters on all sides. What researchers found even more astonishing, are the radioactive wastes that have still not moved outside the limits of the site as they are still held in place tanks to the geology of the area.



What is surprising is that a nuclear reaction had occurred in a way that the plutonium, the by-product, was created and the nuclear reaction itself had been moderated something considered as a “holy grail” for atomic science. The ability to moderate the reaction means that once the reaction was initiated, it was possible to leverage the output power in a controlled way, with the ability to prevent catastrophic explosions or the release of the energy at a single time.

Researchers have dubbed the Nuclear Reactor at Oklo as a “natural Nuclear Reactor”, but the truth about it goes far beyond our normal understanding. Some of the researchers that participated in the testing of the Nuclear reactor concluded that the minerals had been enriched in the distant past, around 1.8 billion years ago, to spontaneously produce a chain reaction. They also concluded that water had been used to moderate the reaction in the same way that the modern nuclear reactors cool down using graphite-cadium shafts preventing the reactor from going into critical state and exploding. All of this, “in nature”.



However, Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg, former head of the United States Atomic Energy Commission and Nobel Prize winner for his work in the synthesis of heavy elements, pointed out that for uranium to “burn” in a reaction, conditions must be exactly right. For example, the water involved in the nuclear reaction must be extremely pure. Even a few parts per million of contaminant will “poison” the reaction, bringing it to a halt. The problem is that no water that pure exists naturally anywhere in the world.



Several specialists talked about the incredible Nuclear Reactor at Oklo, stating that at no time in the geologically estimated history of the Oklo deposits was the uranium sufficiently rich Uranium 235 for a natural nuclear reaction to occur. When these deposits were formed in the distant past, due to the slowness of the radioactive decay of U-235, the fissionable material would have constituted only 3 percent of the total deposits – something too low mathematically speaking for a nuclear reaction to take place. However, a reaction took place mysteriously, suggesting that the original uranium was far richer in Uranium 235 than that in a natural formation.

22 April 2014

BRICS Countries to Set Up their Own IMF

 
The BRICS countries have already agreed on the amount of authorized capital for the new institutions: $100 billion each.

by Olga Samofalova
April 14, 2014
from RBTH Website

Very soon, the IMF will cease to be the world's only organization capable of rendering international financial assistance. The BRICS countries are setting up alternative institutions, including a currency reserve pool and a development bank.

The BRICS countries,

Brazil
Russia
India
China
South Africa,

...have made significant progress in setting up structures that would serve as an alternative to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which are dominated by the U.S. and the EU.

A currency reserve pool, as a replacement for the IMF, and a BRICS development bank, as a replacement for the World Bank, will begin operating as soon as in 2015, Russian Ambassador at Large Vadim Lukov has said.

Brazil has already drafted a charter for the BRICS Development Bank, while Russia is drawing up intergovernmental agreements on setting the bank up, he added.

In addition, the BRICS countries have already agreed on the amount of authorized capital for the new institutions: $100 billion each.

"Talks are under way on the distribution of the initial capital of $50 billion between the partners and on the location for the headquarters of the bank. Each of the BRICS countries has expressed a considerable interest in having the headquarters on its territory," Lukov said.

It is expected that contributions to the currency reserve pool will be as follows:

China, $41 billion

Brazil, India, and Russia, $18 billion each

South Africa, $5 billion

The amount of the contributions reflects the size of the countries' economies.

By way of comparison, the IMF reserves, which are set by the Special Drawing Rights (SDR), currently stand at 238.4 billion Euros, or $369.52 billion dollars. In terms of amounts, the BRICS currency reserve pool is, of course, inferior to the IMF.

However, $100 billion should be quite sufficient for five countries, whereas the IMF comprises 188 countries - which may require financial assistance at any time.

BRICS Development Bank

The BRICS countries are setting up a Development Bank as an alternative to the World Bank in order to grant loans for projects that are beneficial not for the U.S. or the EU, but for developing countries.

The purpose of the bank is to primarily finance external rather than internal projects. The founding countries believe that they are quite capable of developing their own projects themselves.

For instance, Russia has a National Wealth Fund for this purpose.

"Loans from the Development Bank will be aimed not so much at the BRICS countries as for investment in infrastructure projects in other countries, say, in Africa," says Ilya Prilepsky, a member of the Economic Expert Group.

"For example, it would be in BRICS' interest to give a loan to an African country for a hydropower development program, where BRICS countries could supply their equipment or act as the main contractor."

If the loan is provided by the IMF, the equipment will be supplied by western countries that control its operations.

The creation of the BRICS Development Bank has a political significance too, since it allows its member states to promote their interests abroad.

"It is a political move that can highlight the strengthening positions of countries whose opinion is frequently ignored by their developed American and European colleagues.

The stronger this union and its positions on the world arena are, the easier it will be for its members to protect their own interests," points out Natalya Samoilova, head of research at the investment company Golden Hills-Kapital AM.

Having said that, the creation of alternative associations by no means indicates that the BRICS countries will necessarily quit the World Bank or the IMF, at least not initially, says Ilya Prilepsky.

Currency reserve pool 


In addition, the BRICS currency reserve pool is a form of insurance, a cushion of sorts, in the event a BRICS country faces financial problems or a budget deficit.

In Soviet times it would have been called "a mutual benefit society", says Nikita Kulikov, deputy director of the consulting company HEADS. Some countries in the pool will act as a safety net for the other countries in the pool.

The need for such protection has become evident this year, when developing countries' currencies, including the Russian ruble, have been falling.

The currency reserve pool will assist a member country with resolving problems with its balance of payments by making up a shortfall in foreign currency. Assistance can be given when there is a sharp devaluation of the national currency or massive capital flight due to a softer monetary policy by the U.S. Federal Reserve System, or when there are internal problems, or a crisis, in the banking system.

If banks have borrowed a lot of foreign currency cash and are unable to repay the debt, then the currency reserve pool will be able to honor those external obligations.

This structure should become a worthy alternative to the IMF, which has traditionally provided support to economies that find themselves in a budgetary emergency.

"A large part of the fund goes toward saving the euro and the national currencies of developed countries.

Given that governance of the IMF is in the hands of western powers, there is little hope for assistance from the IMF in case of an emergency. That is why the currency reserve pool would come in very handy," says ambassador Lukov.

The currency reserve pool will also help the BRICS countries to gradually establish cooperation without the use of the dollar, points out Natalya Samoilova.

This, however, will take time. For the time being, it has been decided to replenish the authorized capital of the Development Bank and the Currency Reserve Pool with U.S. dollars.

Thus the U.S. currency system is getting an additional boost.

However, it cannot be ruled out that very soon (given the threat of U.S. and EU economic sanctions against Russia) the dollar may be replaced by the ruble and other national currencies of the BRICS counties.

The Global Banking System

25 May 2012

Racism is Racism is Racism


This is a response to life in South Africa under its one-party state called the African National Congress (ANC) which has proved the obvious fact that racism does not come from the colour of your skin but from the colour of your character.

Jewish people can behave like Nazis as well as being treated horrifically by them; black people can be racist just as white people can; South Africa can be deeply, deeply corrupt, just as it was under white dictatorship. Racism is a state of being, not a pigmentation or genetic history.

To be President of South Africa you only have to be (often corruptly) selected as leader of the ANC and this system of ‘can’t lose’ politics has led the country down the road to chaos and incompetence on a scale that beggars belief. An idiot becoming leader of the ANC thanks to the ANC inner circle means that an idiot becomes leader of the nation because the ANC has a monopoly on government. Ironically, behind the scenes the same network of white families that ruled covertly under apartheid and its one-party dictatorship still rule under one-party 'democracy'. The dominant colour may have changed, but not the controllers.

The words in the account posted here were circulated anonymously, but they should be heard to give balance to situations that can be found all over the world where the term ‘racist’ is used not to expose real racists, but used by real racists to protect real racists (see Rothschild Zionism for a start).


A South African artist called Brett Murray has been causing a huge stir since his painting of South Africa’s president titled The Spear was put up in a local gallery. The ANC have worked themselves up into a total frothy about the painting and their biggest issue with it - It’s racist. ???????

Disrespectful, maybe. Rude, maybe. But racist???

That little word that has become the political whip with which the ANC work the masses up into angry mobs and riots anytime something happens that they don’t like. And it’s becoming really really tiring.

In South Africa, the word racist has lost it’s original meaning and now only get’s used to describe a white person doing something a black person doesn’t like. You never hear it used in any other context. You can’t say to a black CEO that he is racist because he won’t hire white people, no - he’s just making sure that only blacks get hired because of BEE. You can’t call a university racist because they won’t accept an application from a white student with straight A’s for 8 subjects - instead taking on a black student who barely passed matric. Nope, they’re not racist, they’re just correcting the wrongs of the past. But god forbid you do hire the white person or you do admit the white student, you’ll be branded racist by the government quicker that you can say “colour shouldn’t be the issue here” because how dare you choose a white person over a black person in a democratic South Africa.

Most of the time when you are a white person and you call your fellow countrymen to be held accountable for their unacceptable words and actions such as corruption, nepotism, fraud, theft, you’ll be branded a racist.

Today, I shouted at a taxi driver who pushed in-front of me nearly driving me into the curb with no regard for the fact that I have a child in the car - I must be a racist, because only racists care about road safety it would seem.

I complained to the manager of my bank because the woman handling my account is so incompetent and hasn’t responded to one email or message I’ve left her for over 2 months! Nevermind that my account is about to be shut down because of FICA. I must be a racist then because only racists expect service from a bank and stupidly think an organisation is going to actually do the job they promise to do in all their marketing material.

The other day my husband confronted a woman outside a shopping centre after she carelessly threw her fast food packet on the floor less than 10cm from a dustbin. Her response - "you’re just a racist". Yes, you’re absolutely right, because only racists care about keeping their city clean and litter free.

I fired a lady who worked for me once because I caught her rummaging through one of my cupboards and she had taken my passport and other belongings which I found in her bag. Her only response - "you’re a racist". Yes, yes I am. Because only racists think that stealing is a criminal offense and is done by people with no morals or conscience.

I swear being a white person in this country can be very bloody exasperating at times. The ANC has brainwashed the masses with this little word - racist - to the point that it’s actually completely lost its meaning and now get’s used totally out of context. Most days I just let it pass and I don’t go into effect of it. But today is not one of those days. Today I’m angry and today I’m sick and tired of it.

I’m not shouting at you because you’re black, I’m shouting because you’re a maniac on the roads who is a danger to society.

I’m not complaining to your manager because you’re black. I’m complaining because you’re an incompetent moron who is incapable of doing her job properly.

I’m not firing you because you’re black. I’m firing you because you’re a thief.

I’m not confronting you because your black, I’m shouting at you because you’re a messy pig who expects other people to clean up your mess.

Please get over yourselves and move out the way of the remarkably amazing black people who DO take total responsibility and who actually want this country to work for ALL the people who live in it.

If being a racist in this country means that I will stand up for my rights, fight for what is fair and true and hold everyone around me accountable for their words and actions, then I am a racist through and through. If being a racist means that I believe in freedom of speech and expression and that everyone’s point of view is relevant, no matter what colour, age or sex, then I will proudly announce to all who can hear that I am a racist. If being a racist means that I believe we should all be treated with the same rules and consequences and that no-one, especially not the President, is above the law and exempt from criminal prosecution when that law has been broken, then print me a t-shirt saying “I am a racist” and I will wear it in the streets. If being a racist means that I will not stand idly by while the few, corrupt pigs in the ANC rape this country for everything they can get with no regard for the poor and the homeless and the uneducated, then I’ll get I’m a racist tattooed on my back.

Mr Zuma and the ANC - you need to get a different vocabulary. Instead of shouting at someone like Brett Murray about a painting being offensive, maybe you should be asking yourselves why he painted it in the first place. Instead of wanting to take Zapiro to court every time he depicts the president & his shower head in one of his cartoons, why don’t you stop to realise that there is truth in everything he draws and that your angry responses are really due to the fact that he keeps hitting a nerve that’s a little too close to home.

Maybe, Mr Zuma, it’s time to take a long, hard look in the mirror. If you were honest with yourself you’d see that people actually have very little respect for you because you have lied and cheated your way through your Presidency. You have been involved with more seedy, corrupt criminals than Horatio Cane and you have abused funds for personal gain. You have raped, lied, stolen, protected evil men and weezled your way out of prosecution and you wonder why people continue to take the piss out of you in the media and treat you with utter contempt. Even the great Oliver Tambo’s daughter doesn’t think much of you based on what she had to say about the painiting: “He should inspire the reverence he craves. This portrait is what he inspired”

You Mr Zuma and your ANC are a bunch of CANTS!

CAN’T let go of the past
CAN’T operate in your life without breaking the rules
CAN’T find your integrity with a map and a flashlight and a tour guide (unless you pay them off).
CAN’T treat women with any kind of respect
CAN’T obey the laws of this country
CAN’T stop operating from a place of revenge and hate for what’s happened in the past
CAN’T find a way forward with no agenda or payoff
CAN’T stop putting family members in government positions for which they are not qualified
CAN’T stop the out of control corruption that is rife throughout every government department
CAN’T stop getting involved in shady, underhanded deals
CAN’T seem to get the education right in this country
CAN’T say goodbye of Affirmative Action and BEE which is ruining businesses across this land

But what do I know?

I’m just a white girl talking about a black man.

I must be a racist

07 May 2012

Nelson Mandela: When is Terrorism Not Terrorism?



by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Terrorism is not terrorism when the Illuminati Jewish banking cartel is behind it.

From 1961-1990, the Illuminati-sponsored African National Congress waged a terrorist war against the Apartheid government of South Africa. It was characterized as a "peoples' struggle" in the Zionist-controlled mass media. 

However, when the Palestinians employ terror against the Apartheid regime of Israel, they are "terrorists."  Never mind that Israel was built on Zionist terror against the British. When the Illuminati bankers or their shills use it, terror is freedom fighting. (Syria today is another example.) 

In South Africa during the 1960's and 70's, barely a week went by without terrorism -- dynamite at a fuel depot, a car bomb outside Air Force headquarters in in a city center. The ANC's guerrilla force -- known simply as MK, or more formally as Umkhonto we Sizwe  translated "Spear of the Nation" was founded in 1961 by Nelson Mandela and his handler, the Communist Jew Joe Slovo. 

At first, the targets were infrastructure but two decades later MK was killing civilians without compunction -- grenades would be bowled into a hamburger joint, or trip wired limper mine planted in an arcade -- and Mandela did not object.

"Notable among these attacks were the January, 8 1982 attack on the Koeberg nuclear power plant near Cape Town, the Church Street bombing on May, 20 1983, killing 19, and the June 14 1986 car-bombing of Magoo's Bar in Durban, in which 3 people were killed and 73 injured." (Wikipedia)

Of course, Mandela had been in jail since 1963 when MK headquarters at a farm outside Johannesburg was raided. The ANC was funded and run by Communist Jews who in turn were shills for the Illuminati bankers. Mandela posed as a farmhand. 

The farm was purchased and run by Jewish Communist Arthur Goldreich.

In 1985, when the government offered to release Mandela if he would repudiate terrorism, he refused. In 1990, he was let out anyway and vowed the MK would continue to wreak havoc. It was not necessary. 

The government was ready to negotiate a handover of power. In 1994, Mandela and F.W. de Klerk shared a Nobel Peace Prize.
Queen Elizabeth II in her 1996 Christmas message hailed Mandela as a great statesman. (The account of MK terror above is indebted to Philip Gourevitch's review of the novel "Absolution" in The New Yorker, April 30, 2012, p.70)

ANC IS A COMMUNIST JEWISH FRONT

Thanks to Michael Hoffman II, we know:  

"The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, "one of its foremost intellectuals"( London Sunday Times, August 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo, 1926-1995).

Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist Party in 1986. ("Joe Slovo," Jewish Chronicle, January 13, 1995).

Slovo had been the "planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured many others... Slovo, who had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was awarded a Soviet medal on his 60th birthday...Slovo is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist without morality of any kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the human cost, whatever the bloodshed...Slovo disputes little of his image as 'the Communist mastermind' behind the ANC's armed struggle. 

'Revolutionary violence has created the inspirational impact that we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading position,' Slovo said." ("Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid," L.A. Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela's ANC took over South Africa, Slovo was named Minister of Housing."

Keep reading for South African housing conditions.

COMMUNISM IS A RUSE

Wrapped in bogus idealism, Jewish social & political activism serves the Illuminati's secret satanic agenda. Jewish activists are dupes or opportunists. The ANC, like Communism in general, deceived the masses into overthrowing the government and installing Illuminati frontmen like Nelson Mandela.

The plight of Blacks in South Africa is much worse under the "peoples' government." The number of people living on $1 a day doubled from two to four million. The unemployment rate doubled to 48% from 1991-2002. (It is 24% today.)

In 2006, only 5,000 of the more than 35 million black South Africans earned more than $60,000. A quarter of the entire population lived in shacks without running water or electricity. A quarter have no access to clean water. 40% have no telephone.

The HIV/AIDS/TB infection rate is 20%. Life expectancy dropped by 13 years.  40% of schools have no electricity.

Where is the ANC'S concern for the people? Obviously it was a ruse that enabled the bankers to gain control over South Africa's resources, just as they took Russia's 70 years before . Source

CONCLUSION
 

Terrorism is an instrument of the Illuminati Jewish central banking cartel based in London.

Ninety five percent of the world's terror, including 9-11, can be traced to this source via the world's intelligence services, especially the CIA, Mossad and MI-6. They are funding the Taliban so Americans can waste their energy in endless war.

We live in a society that is breathtaking in its hypocrisy. But that is the strategy, to pretend to be one thing while becoming its opposite.
---
Note: Ron alerted me to this:

SUNDAY HERALD, UK: Nelson Mandela is ... named as an MI6 agent who... allowed UK spying operations to be based in South Africa. Allegations of Mandela's recruitment by the British intelligence service ... revealed in a controversial new book, 'MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations,' by the acclaimed intelligence expert Stephen Dorril.

28 March 2012

BRICS Move To Replace Dollar With 'Super-Sovereign' Global Currency

'As China is expected to rise to the status of a financial superpower within the next 8 years and eclipse the US economy by 2020, Africa becomes center stage in the greatest currency war the world has seen since the 1930s, which is now shifting into overdrive.

Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, collectively known as the BRICS nations, are moving forward with their plan to unseat the US dollar from its throne as the global trade currency and to replace it with a Chinese-denominated “super-sovereign” international currency.

This Geo-political game to establish global monetary dominance is by no means limited to the attack on the US dollar. Instead this is merely the first strike of a concerted campaign of worldwide economic warfare that will soon follow which seeks to bring the United States and its western allies to their knees.'

Read more: BRICS Move To Replace Dollar With 'Super-Sovereign' Global Currency