TRANSITION FROM KALI YUGA TO SATHYA YUGA

DISCIPLINE THAT SEEKS TO UNIFY THE SEVERAL EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HUMAN NATURE IN AN EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND INDIVIDUALS AS BOTH CREATURES OF THEIR ENVIRONMENT AND CREATORS OF THEIR OWN VALUES


THE WORLD ALWAYS INVISIBLY AND DANGEROUSLY REVOLVES AROUND PHILOSOPHERS

THE USE OF KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

OLDER IS THE PLEASURE IN THE HERD THAN THE PLEASURE IN THE EGO: AND AS LONG AS THE GOOD CONSCIENCE IS FOR THE HERD, THE BAD CONSCIENCE ONLY SAITH: EGO.

VERILY, THE CRAFTY EGO, THE LOVELESS ONE, THAT SEEKETH ITS ADVANTAGE IN THE ADVANTAGE OF MANY — IT IS NOT THE ORIGIN OF THE HERD, BUT ITS RUIN.

LOVING ONES, WAS IT ALWAYS, AND CREATING ONES, THAT CREATED GOOD AND BAD. FIRE OF LOVE GLOWETH IN THE NAMES OF ALL THE VIRTUES, AND FIRE OF WRATH.

METAMATRIX - BEYOND DECEPTION

Search This Blog

12 December 2013

The Internet of Everything - Annihilating Time and Space

by Liron Shapira
December 1, 2013
from Gigaom Website 

Liron Shapira is the co-founder and CTO of Quixey and is an advisor to the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI). 
In the future everyone will be connected - everywhere, all the time - making space and time no longer an issue for physical devices, people and products.
  
Which modern technology, “enables us to send communications…with the quickness of thought, and to annihilate time as well as space”?  

If you answered “the internet,” you’re right. If you answered “the telephone,” “the television” or any other speed-of-light telecommunication technology, you’re also right.

That quote is from an 1860 book by George Bartlett Prescott, an American telegraph official.

In 1860, the fastest telecommunication link between California and New York was the Pony Express, which took at least 10 days to get a message to the other side of the continent. Then one day in 1861, the First Transcontinental Telegraph was completed and you could send the same message across the continent in 10 seconds.

Two days later, the Pony Express officially ceased operations. Prescott was onto something.
The Ancient Greek word “tele” means “far away”. To telecommunicate is to communicate farther than you can shout.

When you connect two points with a speed-of-light telecommunication channel, you annihilate the spacetime-distance between the points. You get a kind of wormhole.

The internet is a network of spacetime wormholes connecting every human being on the planet. If you want to chat with someone face to face, you just stare into your cell phone and they stare into theirs. You can’t tell if they’re a thousand miles away, or in the next room.

But when it comes to physical things, we’re still living under the tyranny of spacetime.

Kevin Ashton, the inventor of the term “Internet of Things”, wrote in 1999:
“We’re physical, and so is our environment… You can’t eat bits, burn them to stay warm or put them in your gas tank. Ideas and information are important, but things matter much more.”
Just look around the room right now, at anything other than your cell phone.

All the things you can see and touch depend on where you are in space, or on how much time you spend moving yourself to a new location.

That’s a problem, because at any given moment, most of the things you care about aren’t in your line of sight. Almost none of the food you’re going to eat that day is. Almost none of the appliances you’re going to use that night are.

That’s the tyranny of spacetime, which the internet of things is now beginning to overthrow.

The internet of things has three major spacetime-annihilating functions:
  • Transportation - making far away things come to you
  • Teleportation - instantly getting copies of far away things
  • Telepresence - interacting with far away people and things

Transportation


In the past, far away things had no way to know what you wanted from them or when you wanted it.

The right things wouldn’t know how to find you. So you’d have to travel to where the things were -  to a restaurant, to your house, to various stores.

If you shop on Amazon instead of going to the store, you’re on the internet of things.

Last year, Amazon acquired robotic warehouse technology company Kiva systems. When you one-click on that toothbrush, Amazon’s robots move it from deep inside the warehouse onto the floor where employees pack it and ship it to you.

The internet of things transports things to you pretty fast, but not at the speed of light. It uses the internet’s fast-moving bits the way skydivers use a little pilot chute to pull out a bigger, heavier parachute.

 

Teleportation


Actually, sometimes the internet of things does make faraway things come you at the speed of light. The trick, called “teleportation”, is to convert things to bits and then back to things again.

The first teleporters were invented before the internet, but the far away “facsimiles” they brought you were just pieces of paper. Modern teleporters are a lot more versatile.

The MakerBot Digitizer can scan 3D objects and store their structure as a file of bits. The MakerBot Replicator can read a file of bits and print a 3D object. Put the Digitizer and Replicator at opposite ends of an internet connection and you get a teleporter.

Thousands of objects can already be teleported at the speed of light - silverware, vases, lamp frames, and even some weird-looking, but functional shoes.

Soon the internet will be able to teleport physical objects into your lap as easily as it teleports web pages into your screen, and you’ll be able to surf the internet of things.

Telepresence


Sometimes you want to interact with far away things without having them transport or teleport to you. Then what you want is telepresence.

For example, you often move far away from your locked bike. Normally that means you can’t unlock your bike to let a friend borrow it, and you also don’t know when thieves are cutting your lock.

LOCK8 is a smart bike lock that lets you unlock it from far away, and notifies you when a potential thief is tampering with it. No matter how far away you are from your bike lock, LOCK8 gives you all the benefits of being near your bike lock.

What if you’re far away from your office, but still want to attend meetings as if you weren’t? Virtual presence systems like Anybots and Suitable Technologies’ Beam let you remote control a walking, talking, seeing, hearing robot.

You can travel halfway around the world, and still have a physical presence at your office.

The future - The internet of everything

Did you know you have two wireless modems in your head?

Your eyes constantly receive radio signals in the visible spectrum, and your sense of vision connects your brain to nearby physical things, like a de facto Local Area Network. But your sensory LAN connection only extends as far as your line of sight. It’s nothing compared to a Wi-Fi internet connection.

In the future of the internet of things, Wi-Fi is going to be everywhere, and the internet will connect you to every person and thing on the planet via transportation, teleportation and telepresence.

A trillion wormholes will let you reach out from anywhere on earth and hug your loved ones, or try on a new pair of shoes, or unlock your bike.

In the future beyond the internet of things, all your senses will be wired directly into the internet’s wormholes, and you’ll be completely indifferent to the location of your physical body.

When you look around you, you won’t be looking into a nearby region of space.

You’ll be surfing an internet that annihilates all time and space - the internet of everything.

09 December 2013

How Plato’s "The Republic" Describes Today's Society

by Julian Websdale
September 2, 2013 
from JulianWebsdale Website  

The Republic (Greek: Πολιτεία, Politeia) is a Socratic dialogue, written by Plato around 380 BC, concerning the definition of justice and the order and character of the just city-state and the just man.

It is Plato’s best-known work and has proven to be one of the most intellectually and historically influential works of philosophy and political theory.

In it, Socrates along with various Athenians and foreigners discuss the meaning of justice and examine whether or not the just man is happier than the unjust man by considering a series of different cities coming into existence "in speech", culminating in a city (Kallipolis) ruled by philosopher-kings; and by examining the nature of existing regimes.

The participants also discuss,
 


-the theory of forms 

-the immortality of the soul

-the roles of the philosopher and of poetry in society

In The Republic Plato describes four types of government:

-monarchy

-oligarchy

-tyranny

-democracy


The Allegory of the Cave is a discussion on human mentality and the body politic, our thinking and being.

There are four types of people in the cave, though nowhere in the text are the characters overtly counted.

In the cave there are the captors and captives.

The captives in the cave are controlled and know nothing in life but the cave, worse they only know one wall of the cave.

The captors use a fire to cast shadows on the wall the prisoners face to keep them captivated and distracted by a made up reality. Among the captives there are the chained and the unchained.

The chained are held in place so that they can only look straight ahead and are convinced of the reality and moreover importance of the shadows.

The unchained are transfixed with the images and convinced of the reality and moreover the importance of the shadows to the point they don’t need chains. They are held by shadows, like elephants onto a string.

Both the chained and unchained captives have no interest in their actual existence as captives in a cave.

They are not conscious, they are not aware of self or their surroundings, or the captors, they are only aware of and concerned with the shadows.

The captors hold the captives with shadows, as distractions. There are the chained captives, the unchained captives and the captors who hold them. The fourth character in the allegory, the fourth distinct part of the set, is the freed prisoner.

The freed prisoner, after being in the cave his whole life, finds himself aboveground and is at first pained by sunlight and then begins to see.

First he sees only shadows as that is what he is accustomed to, then reflections, then the objects casting shadows and then finally the total of his surroundings, himself, others and the stars and the sun.

The freed prisoner learns about sunlight and the dependence of all things on it.

He learns about the basic tenets of 'reality' and that the sun is the true light, not the captors’ fire. The freed prisoner learns about simple conditions of reality and the things which the captors’ shadows represented. He becomes conscious and understands his place in the world.

He realizes he was deceived his whole life and that everyone he had ever known from the cave is imprisoned and deceived as well. And he has to return.

After deliberation the freed prisoner returns and attempts to inform the captives of their predicament and, by that, free them.

The chained and unchained captives scorn the freed prisoner for not being able to see in the dark cave, his eyes having adjusted to daylight. Eventually they want to eliminate the freed prisoner for revealing their predicament to them, for upsetting the status quo, even though they are held captive by it.

The controlling captors of course seek to eliminate him or anyone who questions and exposes the cave system for what it is.

The three characters being compelled to remove the fourth distinct type, the freed prisoner, the one who seeks to free the captives and show them true light as opposed to control in the cave, is reflective of how controlling institutions operate.

The political and actual representations are easy enough to quantify and the power of the freed prisoner or righteous rebel is recognizable throughout the world.

One of the most important layers to the Allegory of the Cave is that of the personal layer of the cave within - the caves people make around themselves. The shadows are false evidence appearing real - fear. The outside world of fires and shadows often uses fear to steer, but inside fear is used the same.

A majority of people replay shadows to themselves to keep the status quo inside so they don’t have to face the reality of inside and outside. They have their own personal caves where false evidence appearing real controls them.

The freed prisoner, the righteous rebel, is powerful in the world and can lead us out of our own personal caves toward enlightenment.

The shadows are very much symbolic of the consensus reality, constantly being programmed and reinforced by the mainstream media, which most people believe to be real.

When we follow our intuition, we often find ourselves behaving in ways that the conditioned, imprisoned minds of people around us find impossible to understand.

They have to ‘rationalize’ your words and behavior by saying you are ‘mad’, ‘dangerous’ or ‘delusional’, and may behave in a patronizing manner towards you.

In fact, you are merely different, viewing reality from another point of observation. Do what your heart intuitively tells you, for it is Consciousness speaking - the Silent Voice.

Follow that and the adventure begins...


Sources: 

Smith, E. I. (2011). The Matrix of Four, The Philosophy of the Duality of Polarity

Icke, D. (2010). Human Race Get Off Your Knees - The Lion Sleeps No More

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Republic_(Plato)

http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/plato/rep/

07 December 2013

The Science Delusion


by revolutionloveevolve
Mar 15, 2013

Re-uploaded as TED have decided to censor Rupert and remove this video from the TEDx youtube channel. Follow this link for TED's statement on the matter and Dr. Sheldrake's response. 

DR RUPERT SHELDRAKE, Ph.D.

Born 28 June 1942, is a biologist and author of more than 80 scientific papers and ten books.

A former Research Fellow of the Royal Society, he studied natural sciences at Cambridge University, where he was a Scholar of Clare College, took a double first class honors degree and was awarded the University Botany Prize. He then studied philosophy and history of science at Harvard University, where he was a Frank Knox Fellow, before returning to Cambridge, where he took a Ph.D. in biochemistry.

He was a Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge, where he was Director of Studies in biochemistry and cell biology. As the Rosenheim Research Fellow of the Royal Society, he carried out research on the development of plants and the ageing of cells in the Department of Biochemistry at Cambridge University.

While at Cambridge, together with Philip Rubery, he discovered the mechanism of polar auxin transport, the process by which the plant hormone auxin is carried from the shoots towards the roots.

From 1968 to 1969, based in the Botany Department of the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, he studied rain forest plants.

From 1974 to 1985 he was Principal Plant Physiologist and Consultant Physiologist at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in Hyderabad, India, where he helped develop new cropping systems now widely used by farmers.

While in India, he also lived for a year and a half at the ashram of Fr Bede Griffiths in Tamil Nadu, where he wrote his first book, A New Science of Life.

From 2005-2010 he was the Director of the Perrott-Warrick Project funded from Trinity College,Cambridge. He is a Fellow of Schumacher College , in Dartington, Devon, a Fellow of the Institute of Noetic Sciences near San Francisco, and a Visiting Professor at the Graduate Institute in Connecticut.

He lives in London with his wife Jill Purce (http://www.healingvoice.com) and two sons.

He has appeared in many TV programs in Britain and overseas, and was one of the participants (along with Stephen Jay Gould, Daniel Dennett, Oliver Sacks, Freeman Dyson and Stephen Toulmin) in a TV series called A Glorious Accident, shown on PBS channels throughout the US.

He has often taken part in BBC and other radio programs.

He has written for newspapers such as the Guardian, where he had a regular monthly column, The Times, Sunday Telegraph, Daily Mirror, Daily Mail, Sunday Times, Times Educational Supplement, Times Higher Education Supplement and Times Literary Supplement, and has contributed to a variety of magazines, including New Scientist, Resurgence, the Ecologist and the Spectator.

Books by Rupert Sheldrake: 

A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Formative Causation (1981). New edition 2009 (in the US published as Morphic Resonance)

The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature (1988)

The Rebirth of Nature: The Greening of Science and God (1992)

Seven Experiments that Could Change the World: A Do-It-Yourself Guide to Revolutionary Science (1994) (Winner of the Book of the Year Award from the British Institute for Social Inventions)

Dogs that Know When Their Owners are Coming Home, and Other Unexplained Powers of Animals (1999) (Winner of the Book of the Year Award from the British Scientific and Medical Network)

The Sense of Being Stared At, And Other Aspects of the Extended Mind (2003)

With Ralph Abraham and Terence McKenna:
Trialogues at the Edge of the West (1992), republished as Chaos, Creativity and Cosmic Consciousness (2001)
The Evolutionary Mind (1998)

With Matthew Fox:
Natural Grace: Dialogues on Science and Spirituality (1996)
The Physics of Angels: Exploring the Realm Where Science and Spirit Meet (1996)

http://www.sheldrake.org/

03 December 2013

SHEDDING LIGHT ON EVIL

By PAUL LEVY
http://www.awakeninthedream.com/wordpress/shedding-light-on-evil/

It is a fact that cannot be denied: the wickedness of others becomes our own wickedness because it kindles something evil in our own hearts[i]
~C. G. Jung

Whether we see evil in the terrorists or in George W. Bush, I simply cannot imagine anyone would dispute that the face of evil has emerged in our world. There is something about looking at evil, however, that is very different than when we passively witness something we remain unaffected by. No one can see evil and stay untouched. Jung, who to my mind has the deepest insight into the nature of evil of anyone I’ve encountered, said, “The sight of evil kindles evil in the soul─there is no getting away from this fact”[ii] In dealing with evil, we have to recognize that it is not something we can see and remain separate from, as if safely sitting in the audience, out of harm’s way. When we see evil, something inside of us is ignited and set aflame.

At the sight of evil, Jung continued, “Indignation leaps up, angry cries of ‘Justice!’ pursue the murderer, and they are louder, more impassioned and more charged with hate the more fiercely burns the fire of evil that has been lit in our souls.”[iii] When we see evil, if we react with moral indignation, cocksure of our own innocence and righteousness, this itself is an expression that we ourselves have become infected by evil and have become a conduit for evil to act itself out through us. Jung said of this, “True, we are innocent, we are the victims, robbed, betrayed, outraged; and yet for all that, or precisely because of it, the flame of evil glowers in our moral indignation.”[iv]

When we see evil, it triggers a resonant darkness within us, as if we have secretly recognized a part of ourselves. It is important to understand that we could not look at the face of evil and truly see it unless we had that very same evil within ourselves. We wouldn’t be able to recognize it otherwise.

When we see a deeper, archetypal energy such as evil, the fact that something within ourselves becomes touched and activated is analogous to what happens when we see and experience the unconscious as it manifests itself through others. It is impossible to see and experience the unconscious as it is played out in our world and remain a detached, passive witness. When we see the unconscious “out there,” our own unconscious is activated by the experience. The same is true when we witness evil.

It is then a question of whether we can integrate what has been triggered in us, or do we inwardly dissociate from our own darkness, imagining it to be separate from ourselves, and project the evil “out there” onto some “other.” Projecting the shadow like this, Jung said, “…strengthens the opponent’s position in the most effective way, because the projection carries the fear which we involuntarily and secretly feel for our own evil over to the other side and considerably increases the formidableness of his threat.”[v] The dream-like nature of this world is such that if we project out our own darkness, the world will shape-shift and provide convincing evidence that the evil really does exist out there, which simply confirms to us our delusion in a never-ending, self-generating feedback loop.

To the extent that any of us have withdrawn our projection of the shadow “out there,” we have begun, as Jung said, “…the only struggle that is really worthwhile: the fight against the overwhelming power-drive of the shadow.”[vi] For as Jung pointed out, every person:
“harbours within himself a dangerous shadow and adversary who is involved as an invisible helper in the dark machinations of the political monster. It is in the nature of political bodies always to see the evil in the opposite group, just as the individual has an ineradicable tendency to get rid of everything he does not know and does not want to know about himself by foisting it off on somebody else.”[vii]
Both the individual, as well as the body politic, have a tendency to project the evil outside of themselves. An individual projecting the shadow outside of him or herself actually feeds into, supports, and helps to create the shadow projection of the greater body politic.

We are all complicit in what our country is doing in Iraq. We all share in the guilt. The bombs dropping on innocent civilians have our names on them. We are not separate but interconnected and interdependent beings, all part of the greater world community. Jung had this to say, “Since no man lives within his own psychic sphere like a snail in its shell, separated from everybody else, but is connected with his fellow-men by his unconscious humanity, no crime can ever be what it appears to our consciousness to be: an isolated psychic happening.”[viii] This collective guilt, what Jung calls “guilt by contagion” belongs to everyone, there is no getting away from it. To again quote Jung:
“the murder has been suffered by everyone, and everyone has committed it…we have all made this collective psychic murder possible…in this way we are unavoidably drawn into the uncleanness of evil; no matter what our conscious attitude may be. No one can escape this.”[ix]

The evil playing out on the world stage is something all 6.4 billion of us are mutually creating and “dreaming up” together. This is to say that the evil incarnating in our world is something we are not separate from but are all playing roles in and collaborating with. Edmund Burke said, “Evil can only happen when good people do nothing.” Albert Einstein made the same point when he said, “The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”
By being a “dreamed up phenomenon,” the evil appearing in our world is a full-bodied reflection, in living, breathing color of the evil within ourselves. An inner process happening deep within the collective unconscious of all of humanity has been externalized and projected outside of ourselves, literally “dreamed up” into materialization. If the evil that is manifesting prompts enough of us, however, to recognize that it is a mirrored reflection of a part of ourselves and we self-reflect, we can collaboratively metabolize the evil, akin to T cells fighting a virus. We become a collective alchemical container able to co-operatively transmute the darkness into the light of species-wide realization.

Jung said it is only those among us who are self-reflective who have “…the realization of the immense and overwhelming power of evil, and of the fact that mankind is capable of becoming merely the instrument.”[x] [Emphasis added] The realization of our potential susceptibility to self-deception, which could lead to unwitting acts of evil, serves as a psychic immunization, and creates true humility, a safeguard against evil. This is why, to quote Jung, “The true leaders of mankind are always those who are capable of self-reflection.”[xi] Jung also pointed out that, “…only relatively few individuals can be expected to be capable of such an achievement, and they are not the political but the moral leaders of mankind.”[xii] Compared to the moral leaders of humanity, who are embodying consciousness, the political leaders are literally “dreamed up” to be the embodied outer reflection of our collective inner unconsciousness. This always results in criminality.
If we refuse to look at our own darkness and continue to try and destroy the evil we perceive to be outside of ourselves, we fall prey to it and unwittingly become an agent of evil. If we fight evil in our habitual way, which is to try and murder it, we ourselves become a murderer. Interestingly, one of the inner meanings of the word “Satan” is “murderer.” It is like in wrestling with the Devil, the Devil penetrates into our body, pulsates through our very cells and incarnates itself in, through, and as us. By fighting evil, we become possessed by it. Is this the meaning of Christ’s teaching “resist not evil”?

To deal with evil as it manifests in the world, we have to be able to look at and embrace the evil within ourselves. Jung felt, “It is surely better to know that your worst enemy is right there in your own heart.”[xiii] If we refuse to look at the evil within our own heart, however, our refusal simply feeds the evil. If we look away and allow evil to be acted out, thinking that we are innocent, we are unconsciously colluding with evil.

If when we see evil, we experience it as being “out there,” we fall under the illusion of our own shadow projection. Discussing the challenge of recognizing our own innate potential for evil, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn comments,
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being.”[xiv]
The evil that is playing out in the world today is a deeper, archetypal energy that has been re-enacted many times throughout human history. Though he could have been talking about Bush, Jung said of Hitler:
“For this theatrical hysteric and transparent imposter was not strutting about on a small stage, but was riding the armoured divisions of the Wehrmacht, with all the weight of German heavy industry behind him. Encountering only slight and in any case ineffective opposition from within, the nation of eighty million crowded into the circus to witness its own destruction.”[xv]
Frighteningly, in this regard, Bush has outdone Hitler, as Bush has the greatest war machine the world has ever known at his disposal. And he wants to weaponize space, and build even more nuclear bombs. Bush is truly a madman. We need to recognize this.

Jung said, “If there was ever a truly apocalyptic era, it is ours. God has put the means for a universal holocaust into the hands of man.”[xvi] What is unique about our current situation, Jung continued:
“is not that present-day man is capable of greater evil than the man of antiquity or the primitive. He merely has incomparably more effective means with which to realize his propensity to evil. As his consciousness has broadened and differentiated, so his moral nature has lagged behind. That is the great problem before us today: Reason alone no longer suffices”[xvii] [Emphasis in original}

It has become clear that our rationality alone cannot resolve our world crisis, something else is needed. We are at an event horizon in the process of the expansion of consciousness itself. In this process, Jung said, “…we need the illumination of a holy and whole-making spirit─a spirit that can be anything rather than our reason.”[xviii]
We are living in an extremely dangerous time, but it is also a time of great opportunity. Jung’s insight was that:
“We are living in what the Greeks called the Kairos─the right moment─for a “metamorphosis of the gods,” of the fundamental principles and symbols. This peculiarity of our time, which is certainly not of our conscious choosing, is the expression of the unconscious man within us who is changing. Coming generations will have to take account of this momentous transformation if humanity is not to destroy itself through the might of its own technology and science.”[xix]

The unleashing of atomic energy, Jung continued:
“has given the human race the power to annihilate itself completely. The situation is about the same as if a small boy of six had been given a bag of dynamite for a birthday present[xx] …the danger that threatens us now is of such dimensions as to make this last European catastrophe [World War II] seem like a curtain-raiser.[xxi]

In an interview with Mircea Eliade in 1952, Jung revealed the scope of his vision when he commented that:
“as long as Satan is not integrated, the world is not healed and man is not saved. But Satan represents evil, and how can evil be integrated? There is only one possibility: to assimilate it, that is to say, raise it to the level of consciousness[xxii] …[this is a state] in which the devil no longer has an autonomous existence but rejoins the profound unity of the psyche. Then the opus magnum [the “great work” of alchemy] is finished: the human soul is completely integrated.[xxiii]
Evil, just like a vampire, can’t stand to be seen, however, for once it is seen and made conscious, it loses its omnipotence and autonomy, as it can no longer act itself out through us. Our task, as Jung reminded us, is “making the darkness conscious.” As each of us recognizes and integrates our own darker halves, we liberate the energy that was bound up in the compulsion to unconsciously act out and dream up our darker side out in the external world. Instead, this archetypal energy of the shadow is assimilated into the wholeness of our personality and becomes available for the expression of creativity and love. Any one of us making the darkness conscious lightens the weight for all of us, as we are all connected.

We need to understand the nature of the “beast” with which we are dealing when we are confronted with evil. The fact that our trying to destroy evil is itself the very thing propagating evil is showing us something. Evil is revealing something to us. This is why Jung referred to Satan as “…the godfather of man as a spiritual being,”[xxiv] meaning that Satan can activate in humankind a process of spiritual awakening that would have been impossible without his intervention. By rebelling against God, Jung continued, “Lucifer was perhaps the one who best understood the divine will struggling to create a world and who carried out that will most faithfully.”[xxv]

Whether the evil currently wreaking havoc on our planet will destroy us or further the evolution of our species and awaken us to deeper levels of our being is entirely up to us. The key is for enough of us to become the aforementioned moral leaders of humanity and look in the mirror, self-reflect, and recognize our complicity with the darkness that is playing out in our world. Self-reflection is the very best service we can do for the divine and the highest way for us to love God. Self-reflection is a true retrieval of our soul─it has an integrating effect, as it is a gathering together and a re-collecting of what had previously been projected out, divided, and separated by the dis-integrating effect of evil. Jung said:
“Self-reflection or─what comes to the same thing─the urge to individuation gathers together what is scattered and multifarious, and exalts it to the original form of the One, the Primordial Man. In this way our existence as separate beings, our former ego nature, is abolished, the circle of consciousness is widened, and because the paradoxes have been made conscious the sources of conflict are dried up.[xxvi]

Jung recognized that whenever evil appeared in an individual’s personal process, some deeper good always came out of the experience that wouldn’t have emerged without the manifestation of evil. Could the same thing be true on a collective scale? Could the evil coming out of hiding in the shadows and becoming visible for all who have eyes to see be the harbinger of a deeper process of collective realization that is becoming available to us because of its emergence? Jung openly wondered whether “…in this very power of evil God might not have placed some special purpose which it is most important for us to know.”[xxvii]
With the appearance of evil, we are invited and even prodded to participate in an evolutionary quantum leap in and of consciousness itself. A doorway has opened up for us to collectively snap out of our imagined identities as “separate beings” and realize that we are all interconnected, on the same side and part of a greater whole. Jung had this to say, “We are perhaps the actors, the implements, the toolbox of a being greater than ourselves, greater at least in having more volume or periphery in which we are contained.”[xxviii] As Buddhism points out, compassion spontaneously arises when we recognize how we interdependently co-arise together. We are all cells in a greater body. We depend on each other.

We are experiencing the revelation of the hidden God, the deus absconditus, the dark side of God. The key to activating the secret blessing aspect of malignant egophrenia is our attitude towards that which we perceive as evil. Will we not recognize what the “shadow of the Lord” is revealing to us and continue to unconsciously act it out and destroy ourselves? Or will the evil propel enough of us over the edge to self-reflection, precipitating a mass spiritual awakening unimaginable until this moment in history? Evil is a true quantum phenomenon, in that it contains both of these possibilities in potential, and how it will manifest depends on how we interact with it. Fighting the devil is radically different than loving God. The choice is truly ours.
(A pioneer in the field of spiritual emergence, Paul Levy is a healer in private practice, assisting others who are also awakening to the dreamlike nature of reality. Paul is also a visionary artist and a spiritually-informed political activist. He is the author of The Madness of George Bush: A Reflection of Our Collective Psychosis,which is available on his website www.awakeninthedream.com. (See the first chapter, The Madness of George W. Bush: A Reflection of our Collective Psychosis). Please feel free to pass this article along to a friend if you feel so inspired. You can contact Paul at paul@awakeninthedream.com; he looks forward to your reflections. © Copyright 2010)

[i] Jung, Civilization in Transition, CW 10, par. 408.
[ii] Ibid., par. 410.
[iii] Ibid., par. 408.
[iv] Ibid., par. 410.
[v] Ibid., par. 572.
[vi] Ibid., par. 455.
[vii] Ibid., par. 576.
[viii] Jung, Psychology and Religion: East and West, CW 11, par. 408.
[ix] Ibid., par. 408.
[x] Jung, Civilization in Transition, CW 10, par. 451.
[xi] Ibid., par. 462.
[xii] Ibid., par. 451.
[xiii] Ibid., par. 456.
[xiv] Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago.
[xv] Jung, Civilization in Transition, CW 10, par. 419.
[xvi] Jung, Letters, vol. 2, p. 209.
[xvii] Jung, Civilization in Transition, CW 10, par. 574.
[xviii] Jung, Psychology and Religion: East and West, CW 11, par. 267.
[xix] Jung, Civilization in Transition, CW 10, par. 585.
[xx] Ibid., par. 485.
[xxi] Ibid., par. 487.
[xxii] McGuire and Hull, C. G. Jung Speaking, p. 227.
[xxiii] Ibid., p. 229.
[xxiv] Jung, Psychology and Religion: East and West, CW 11, par. 600.
[xxv] Ibid., par. 290.
[xxvi] Ibid., par. 401.
[xxvii] Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, CW 12, par. 36.
[xxviii] Jung, Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, vol. 2, p. 1348.

TRIGGERED BY EVIL

By PAUL LEVY
http://www.awakeninthedream.com/wordpress/triggered-by-evil/

Due to the horrific events playing out on the world stage, I find myself unable to avoid the subject of “evil.” Some of my readers have objected to my use of the term “evil,” because it “triggers” something in them which makes them feel uncomfortable, and sometimes even makes them stop reading. Their reaction has made me wonder whether I should use a different word so as not to trigger them, or is activating people the whole point of my writing? When I contemplate this question, however, I am left with the feeling that there is no other word that more accurately describes what I am pointing at than “evil.” I find myself wondering, is there something being revealed to us when, for example, people are triggered by the mere mention of the word “evil?”


When I mention the word evil, I am not talking metaphysically. I am not theologically qualified to do so. When I talk about evil, I am talking about psychological evil, whose effects are all around us. Splitting-off from and projecting out our own darkness is an inner psychological process that explicates itself in the outer world by feeding the seemingly endless destruction in the collective body politic. In using the term psychological evil, I am being pragmatic in that I am referring to the senseless and unnecessary violence being enacted all around us whose source is to be found nowhere but within the human psyche. Psychological evil has a dis-integrative effect on the whole (both inwardly and outwardly), and is hence, anti-life.

Talking about the real-world manifestations of evil, Jung said, “The Christian world is now truly confronted by the principle of evil, by naked injustice, tyranny, lies, slavery, and coercion of conscience…. Evil has become a determinant reality. It can no longer be dismissed from the world by a circumlocution [an indirect, roundabout mode of expression]. We must learn how to handle it, since it is here to stay.” We are clearly being asked – make that demanded – by the universe to come to terms with evil.

Evil animates itself, psychologically speaking, through humanity’s unconsciousness. Evil’s power is only operative in the absence of consciousness. Evil, through our psychological blind spots, plays with our perceptions so as to hide itself. In order to not be destroyed by evil we have to understand the nature of the beast we are dealing with. Like that great maxim of medicine says, “Do not attempt to cure what you do not understand.” We have to bring evil to the level of conscious awareness. To quote Jung, “…how can evil be integrated? There is only one possibility: to assimilate it, that is to say, raise it to the level of consciousness.”

Evil cannot stand to be seen, for when it is truly seen, it is not unconscious anymore, and its seeming power over us gets taken away. Just like a vampire can’t stand the light of consciousness, once we see evil, we take away its autonomy – it can no longer act itself out through us unconsciously. The energy locked up in evil then becomes available to serve what is best for the whole, which is to say it becomes transformed so as to feed and nourish life, instead of creating death.

Jung said, “Today as never before it is important that human beings should not overlook the danger of the evil lurking within them. It is unfortunately only too real, which is why psychology must insist on the reality of evil and must reject any definition that regards it as insignificant or actually non-existent. Psychology is an empirical science and deals with realities.” In this statement Jung is not making a theological statement having to do with the metaphysical reality of evil. He is simply pointing at the psychological reality of evil, whose outward effects are evident all around us.

How much longer can we deny the reality of evil within our own psyche? Our denial is itself the manifestation of the very evil we are denying, while at the same time, our denial engenders the very evil of which our denial is an expression. The fact that evil is so rampant in our world is undeniably a reflection of something within ourselves. This is why Jung said, “We need more psychology. We need more understanding of human nature, because the only real danger that exists is man himself…. His psyche should be studied, because we are the origin of all coming evil.”

It is quite interesting that evil is such a major player in the world and so few people are actually acknowledging its leading role, let alone contemplating its dynamics. To again quote Jung, “One must be positively blind not to see the colossal role that evil plays in the world.” What we are calling evil has been playing itself out throughout history, but now it has come out of hiding in the shadows and is staring us in the face for all who open their eyes and look. Jung pulled no punches when he said, “Evil today has become a visible Great Power.” We can no longer avoid confronting evil, as our very survival as a species depends upon it.

Jung continued, “The view that we can simply turn our back on evil and in this way eschew [avoid, shun] it belongs to the long list of antiquated naiveties. This is sheer ostrich policy and does not affect the reality of evil in the slightest.” This “ostrich policy,” in addition to having no affect on diminishing evil’s very real effects, is unwittingly strengthening evil’s seeming power and sovereignty.

It is a big mistake, a true sin – a missing of the mark – for us to run from and avoid relationship with the evil we find within us. Jung said, “As long as Evil is [considered] a non-entity, nobody will take his own shadow seriously…. The future of mankind very much depends upon the recognition of the shadow. Evil is – psychologically speaking – terribly real. It is a fatal mistake to diminish its power and reality…. Evil verily does not decrease by being hushed up as a non-reality.”

Jung is talking about the profound urgency for each of us to come to terms with our own shadow, which always has both a personal and archetypal dimension. The archetypal dimension of the shadow has a greater breath and depth than the merely personal. Archetypal evil non-locally pervades the entire field of consciousness in which we all partake. If we are not in conscious relationship with our own shadow, we are unwittingly feeding and supporting the collective archetypal shadow spreading throughout the collective field.

Insisting that we shouldn’t talk about or put our attention on evil is one of the ways that evil keeps itself in business. Evil convinces us that to put our attention on evil only feeds it. This deception is so convincing because in one sense it is true. Evil only has power because we invest it with our attention. And yet, our looking away from evil is the very thing that allows it to generate itself and act itself out through our unconscious. A seeming conundrum: looking at evil appears to strengthen it, but looking away gives it power over us. Being unaware of evil due to unconscious denial is very different than consciously choosing not to give it our attention, however. Evil becomes bankrupt and unemployed when we see how it incarnates itself through our unconscious so as to disguise and cloak itself.

One way that evil hides itself is by instilling in us the spiritual belief that evil isn’t real, it doesn’t really exist, that all that is real is “God.” This deception is so seductive because on the ultimate level of reality, the fact that evil doesn’t exist and that all that is real is “God” is true. On the absolute, ultimate level of reality, categories such as good and evil lose all meaning as opposites to each other. From the ultimate point of view, there IS no such thing as evil. Dr. Seyyed Hossein Nasr, one of the world’s foremost scholars on Islam, makes this same point when he says, “…evil is real as much as we, who are relative beings, are real, but it is not real as far as “The Real’ is concerned. That is, in God there is no evil.”
What we call evil is simply the result of our own clinging and grasping. Our own inner darkness is not evil, but simply part of our totality. It is our contracting against any part of ourselves, whether it be dark or light, which generates the seeming problem. Evil’s origin is our self-contraction against our own inner boundless radiance. Our self-contraction is itself an expression of the Divine working through us. Our self-contraction, while appearing to obscure our true nature, is actually a “disguised” expression of it. From the absolute point of view, everything IS spirit. Russian philosopher Nicholas Berdyaev expresses this paradox when he said, “It is equally true that a dark source of evil exists in the world and that in the final sense of the word there is no evil.”

On the relative level of reality, however, evil is as real as real can be. A big mistake some metaphysically-oriented people make is to solely identify with the absolute, and marginalize the relative. Recognizing that there is ultimately no such thing as evil, they refuse to acknowledge and deal with it as it manifests in the relative world of flesh and blood. They try to magically “wish” the very real effects of evil out of existence by denying that it exists, which is a form of denial that strengthens the reality of what is being denied. In their denial they have created an artificial split between the opposites. All spiritual wisdom traditions point out that the absolute and relative levels of reality are not separate from each other; they interpenetrate each other so fully that they are truly one.

THE LION’S GAZE

There is an intrinsic problem with illuminating evil, however, as articulating the nature of evil can actually invoke it in the field. This is to say that even mentioning the word evil can constellate that very quality in the reader, as well as in myself. It then becomes a question of how do we “relate” to the very darkness within us which has been evoked? Do we react in fear, in which case the seeming evil has power over us? Or do we turn the light of consciousness onto the part of ourselves that is the source of the darkness, reflecting upon the very darkness which has been called forth within us?

One of the most beautiful teachings in Buddhism is called “The Lion’s Gaze.” The following example is given as an illustration: when we throw a stick around a dog, the dog runs after the stick, but when we throw a stick around a lion, the lion runs after us. The throwing of the stick in this example represents when something inside of us gets triggered. When we are triggered, it is as if a button inside of us has been pushed which activates an unconscious, compulsive knee-jerk reflex. Running after the stick like the dog, which is to “act out” being triggered, is to put our attention outside of ourselves. “Oh, I don’t want to read about evil, it triggers me. I’m going to stop reading about it.” This is to relate to what is triggering us in the outside world as “the problem.” Having the gaze of the lion, however, if we become triggered by the word evil, for example, we turn within ourselves and self-reflect, looking at whatever it is within us that has gotten activated. The lion is not afraid to go right to the source of the trigger, which is never outside, but always within ourselves. Assuming the fearless gaze of the lion, we relate to the situation that has triggered us as a gift, as it has helped us access a part of ourselves that up until now has been unconscious, and hence hidden.

Shedding the light of our own awareness on what has become activated within us by, for example, our contemplation of evil, is the very act which transforms and liberates the evil within us back into our wholeness. Being in touch with our intrinsic wholeness is to recognize that we include both light and dark. Because evil exists in the non-local field of consciousness itself, we are all susceptible to its snares. Paradoxically, our awareness of our susceptibility to evil cultivates the humility which immunizes us from evil’s harmful effects. The way to deal with evil is to be in touch with our inherent wholeness, what Jung calls the self, which acts as a sacred amulet or talisman, so to speak, shielding and protecting us from evil’s pernicious effects.

Evil is an archetypal content of the collective unconscious, and like the mythic Medusa, can be too much to look at directly (whether it be in the outside world, or within ourselves), as it can be too traumatizing and hence, experienced as overwhelming. Just like seeing Medusa’s reflections in the mirror, we can dis-spell the power of evil in the world by putting our attention on the reflex-ions it activates within ourselves.

It is impossible to see the outer manifestation of evil and stay a detached, passive member of the audience. Being an archetype, evil has an infectious quality; once we see it, we are no longer the same. Once we see evil in the outside world, a resonant frequency within us becomes ignited and set aflame. We can then approach evil’s reflex-ion by looking with the lion’s gaze at what has gotten triggered within us. It is by recognizing evil as it gets reflexively activated within us by the outside world that we assimilate it into the wholeness of our being.

Once we recognize, embrace and thereby metabolize the evil that has been triggered within ourselves, we non-locally lighten the darkness pervading the entire field of consciousness, as the evil within and without are inseparably interconnected as aspects of one unified process. In addition, by becoming consciously aware of our own darkness, we become self-empowered to effectively deal with the evil in the outer world in new and more creative ways that were previously unimaginable. Awakening to the darkness within us, we can connect with each other in lucid awareness and actively mobilize our collective genius so as to genuinely transform our world.

As we become more deeply acquainted with the evil within us, it is discovered to be a potential catalyst for the growth and expansion of consciousness, which is to say that evil ultimately serves the good. Jung recognized that whenever evil appeared in an individual person’s process, some deeper good always came out of the experience that would not have emerged without the manifestation of evil. Could the same thing be true on a collective scale? To quote Jung, “…we assiduously avoid investigating whether in this very power of evil God might not have placed some special purpose which it is most important for us to know.” We would not have had an expansion of consciousness if it weren’t for the emergence of evil and our struggles with it. In Goethe’s masterpiece “Faust,” Faust asks Mephistopheles (who represents the Devil) who he is, and Mephistopheles replies that he is “…part of that force which would do evil, yet forever works the good.” In coming to terms with evil, evil is recognized to play a key role in the divine mystery of the Incarnation (of God) through humanity.

It is imperative for us to find the name for what is happening in our world. To find the name of the demon is to exorcise it. This is the power of the logos, of the word. Like it says in the Bible, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1). Finding the name is a creative act which has the power to change the universe. Jung said, “For mankind it was always like a deliverance from a nightmare when the new name was found.” We need to realize that the hour is upon us, and that we are being asked by the universe to deal with the evil in the outside world by finding its name within ourselves. Seeing the evil within ourselves allows us to get a “handle” on it.

Could it be that our unconscious re-action against even the mere mention of the word “evil” is touching a deeper, hidden part of ourselves so as to reveal it to us? Is our being triggered the very portal through which we can potentially learn how to effectively deal with evil? Is evil reflecting itself back to us through our reactions to it so as to transform itself, and us, in the process? Is the emergence of evil in our world the revelation of the very part of ourselves which we need to know in order to awaken? The answer to these questions is to be found by turning the lion’s gaze of awareness towards the darkness which is being triggered within us.

Once we genuinely see the evil inside of us, we don’t have to feed it by fixating our attention on it, as this would only be draining. Realizing that we can choose where we put our awareness empowers us. Once we see our own darkness, we can consciously choose not to focus on it for too long. We can then invest our energy in-visioning the world we want to co-create with each other, dreaming it up into actual materialization, a truly evolutionary act.

Jung said, “…for in the self good and evil are indeed closer than identical twins!” In the wholeness of the self, good and evil are indivisibly united, endlessly turning into one another so as to be ultimately indistinguishable. Jung commented, “In the empirical self, light and shadow form a paradoxical unity.” The perspective which realizes that good and evil are not opposites but inseparably united is the aforementioned ultimate, or absolute state of consciousness. Could it be that this is the deeper meaning and teleology (purpose or goal) of evil in our world: to wake us up to our identity with divinity? Once enough of us realize this, we are able to creatively connect with each other and collectively transmute the destructive effects of evil into the liberating light of love itself. How miraculous!

(A pioneer in the field of spiritual emergence, Paul Levy is a healer in private practice, assisting others who are also awakening to the dreamlike nature of reality. Paul is also a visionary artist and a spiritually-informed political activist. He is the author of The Madness of George Bush: A Reflection of Our Collective Psychosis, which is available on his website www.awakeninthedream.com. (See the first chapter, The Madness of George W. Bush: A Reflection of our Collective Psychosis). Please feel free to pass this article along to a friend if you feel so inspired. You can contact Paul at paul@awakeninthedream.com; he looks forward to your reflections. © Copyright 2010)