The NASA Conspiracy

NASA used Codename Santa Claus for three UFOs during moon landing

According to statements from a former NASA contractor, there were, at least, three flying saucers on the moon during one of the NASA moon landings. Sadly, like many other things, these mysterious UFO sightings were covered up.

Donna Hare who worked for computer and engineering contractor Philco-Ford during the early 70s, in NASA’s photo labs on and off the site of the group’s HQ states she had high clearance which allowed her to access parts of the building know internally as ‘building eight’ allowing her to get in touch with a series of “high ranking officials who leaked her information in secret over lunch”.

Ms. Hare claims in a video testimony to have acquired information from NASA officials who wanted to disclose information about the existence of Unidentified Flying Objects but were threatened with the loss of their pensions and forced to sign gagging orders.

Making strong claims, Hare states that one of her contacts who spoke out about the information had “disappeared off the face of the Earth”.

Are also claims that she was informed by several sources about Unidentified Flying Objects and that during one of the moon landings astronauts discovered THREE Alien Spaceships that had landed on the surface of the moon when Astronauts touched down on the surface.

According to statements from Hare, one of her contacts worked in an ‘off limit’ area where landing astronauts were ‘debriefed’ after returning to Earth.

“This man was in quarantine with them and was part of their debriefing. He said a lot of then talked about their experience of these crafts following them,” said Hare.

“I believe there were three of them on the moon when they landed and I believe that the code word for them was was Santa Claus.

“Some (staff) that wanted to talk were threatened and if they wanted to talk they had to sign papers not to talk or they had their retirement taken away,

“I started asking questions of certain people. I would take them away from the site and we would go to lunch.

“Alone they would tell me things and then say if I ever said they had they would swear I was lying.

“One gentleman I knew who said there were the crafts on the moon just disappeared, I can’t find him,” she added.

Ms. Hare also claims that she witnessed one NASA image displaying a UFO being airbrushed by one technician

“One gentleman I had been friends with pointed my attention to an open area of a mosaic, a set of panels put together to form a larger picture,” said Hare.

“I saw a round white dot and asked is it a dot of emulsion.

“Grinning he said a dot of emulsion doesn’t leave round shadows, then I saw a round shadow over trees. “I said is this a UFO – he was smiling I can’t tell you that but Ii knew he meant it was, but he couldn’t tell me

“He said well we always have to airbrush them out before they sell them to the public.

“I was just amazed they had a protocol in place for getting rid of UFO’s in pictures,” she added.

Event though many claim that these accounts are just part of an elaborate hoax easily debunked, Ms. Hare claims that all her accounts are true and that she has nothing to hide.

Hare isn’t the first person to claim to have worked for NASA while speaking out about UFOs and Alien life.

SOURCE

For more information, visit http://www.SiriusDisclosure.com.

Subscribe at http://www.youtube.com/sdisclosure.

Donna Hare had a secret clearance while working for NASA contractor, Philco Ford. She testifies that she was shown a photo of a picture with a distinct UFO. Her colleague explained that it was his job to airbrush such evidence of UFOs out of photographs before they were released to the public. She also heard information from other Johnson Space Center employees that some astronauts had seen extraterrestrial craft and that when some of them wanted to speak out about this, they were threatened.

Get updates by following The Disclosure Project and CSETI on:

FACEBOOK:
http://www.facebook.com/SiriusTheMovie
http://www.facebook.com/Disclosure.Pr...
http://www.facebook.com/CSETI.org

TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/DrStevenGreer

"Sirius" the movie available on Video-On-Demand at http://www.SiriusDisclosure.com and for purchase on DVD at http://sirius-disclosure.myshopify.com

Get updates at:
http://www.facebook.com/SiriusTheMovie

Documents and testimony from "Disclosure: Military and Government Witnesses Reveal The Greatest Secrets in Modern History" by Dr. Steven M. Greer.

The Psychology of Stress, Orgasm, and Creativity

“To understand the vagina properly is to realize that it is not only coextensive with the female brain, but is also, essentially, part of the female soul.”
By Maria Popova

“The more closely we analyze what we consider ‘sexy,’” philosopher Alain de Botton argued in his meditation on sex, “the more clearly we will understand that eroticism is the feeling of excitement we experience at finding another human being who shares our values and our sense of the meaning of existence.” But in his attempt to counter the reductionism that frames human sexuality as a mere physiological phenomenon driven solely by our evolutionary biology, de Botton overcompensates by reducing in the opposite direction, negating the complex interplay of brain and biology, psychology and physiology, that propels the human sexual experience. That’s precisely what Naomi Wolf, author of the 1991 cultural classic The Beauty Myth, examines in Vagina: A New Biography (public library) — a fascinating exploration of the science behind the vastly misunderstood mind-body connection between brain and genitalia, consciousness and sexuality, the poetic and the scientific. What emerges is a revelation of how profoundly a woman’s bodily experience influences nearly every aspect of life, from stress to creativity, through the intricate machinery that links biology and beingness.

Wolf writes:

Female sexual pleasure, rightly understood, is not just about sexuality, or just about pleasure. It serves, also, as a medium of female self-knowledge and hopefulness; female creativity and courage; female focus and initiative; female bliss and transcendence; and as medium of a sensibility that feels very much like freedom. To understand the vagina properly is to realize that it is not only coextensive with the female brain, but is also, essentially, part of the female soul.

Once one understands what scientists at the most advanced laboratories and clinics around the world are confirming — that the vagina and the brain are essentially one network, or “one whole system,” as they tend to put it, and that the vagina mediates female confidence, creativity, and sense of transcendence — the answers to many of these seeming mysteries fall into place.


Handcrafted vagina embroidery by artist Kira Scarlet

A pivotal player in this mediation is the female pelvic nerve — a sort of information superhighway that branches out from the base of the spinal cord to the cervix, connecting the latter to the brain and thus controlling much of sexual response. But this information superhighway is really more like a superlabyrinth, the architecture of which differs enormously from one woman to another, and is completely unique for each one. This diversity of wiring in the highly complex female pelvic neural network helps explain why women have wildly different triggers for orgasm. (By contrast, the male pelvic neural network is significantly simpler, consisting of comparatively regular neural pathways arranged neatly in a grid that surrounds the penis in a circle of pleasure.) This biological reality, Wolf points out, clashes jarringly with the dominant culturally constructed fantasy of how sexual intercourse is supposed to proceed:

The pornographic model of intercourse — even our culture’s conventional model of intercourse, which is quick, goal-oriented, linear, and focused on stimulation of perhaps one or two areas of a woman’s body — is just not going to do it for many women, or at least not in a very profound way, because it involves such a superficial part of the potential of women’s neurological sexual response systems.

Another key component of sexual experience is the autonomic nervous system (ANS) — the puppeteer of arousal, controlling all smooth muscle contractions and affecting the body’s response beyond conscious control. It encompasses both the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions, and ensures they work in unison. Because arousal precedes orgasm, the ANS first needs to do its own work before the complex pelvic neural network can work its own magic. Wolf writes:

For women, sexual response involves entering an altered state of consciousness. … In women, the biology of arousal is more delicate than most of us understand, and it depends significantly on this sensitive, magical, slowly calmed, and easily inhibited system.

To be sure, Wolf reminds us that it’s not at all uncommon for women to have a physiological response during rape, despite the enormous psychological pain and stress of the assault, but this response is not the same as the transcendent, dimensional orgasm that takes place when brain and body work in harmonious bliss. This also holds true in sexual situations that aren’t as violent as rape but still assault the ANS in one way or another:

If a woman’s ANS response is ignored, she can have intercourse and even climax; but she won’t necessarily feel released, transported, fulfilled, or in love, because only a superficial part of her capacity to respond has been made love to, or engaged.

In fact, the most fascinating aspect of the ANS, absolutely critical yet poorly understood, is that it is profoundly impacted by the mental landscape, steering the immutable interdependence between brain and vagina. The ANS, which serves as the translator between the psychological and the physiological, is thus particularly vulnerable to what psychologists call “bad stress.” (By contrast, the “good stress” many women experience in exciting or mock-dangerous sexual scenarios which they still control can be compelling and pleasurable.) “Bad stress” stems from the perceived lack of safety, and the presence of safety is absolutely essential to catapulting the female brain into the kind of “high” orgasm that is only possible in this disinhibited trance state. Wolf explains:

This biological, evolutionary connection for women of possible ecstasy to emotional security has implications that cannot be overstressed. Relaxing allows for female arousal.

Just as being valued and relaxed can heighten female sexual response, “bad stress” can dramatically interfere with all of women’s sexual processes.

“Bad stress,” researchers have now abundantly confirmed, has exactly the same kind of negative effect on female arousal and on the vagina itself. When a woman feels threatened or unsafe, the sympathetic nervous system — the parasympathetic nervous system’s partner in the ANS — kicks in. This system regulates the “fight or flight” response: as adrenaline and catecholamines are released in the brain, nonessential systems such as digestion and, yes, sexual response, close down; circulation constricts, because the heart needs all the blood available to help the body run or fight; and the message to the body is “get me out of here.” Based on [research insights], we now know that threatening environment — which can include even vague verbal threats centered on the vagina or dismissive language about the vagina — can close down female sexual response.

This notion that biology conditions consciousness and vice versa, of course, isn’t new. But the research Wolf cites presents compelling evidence that “bad stress,” especially rape and early sexual trauma, can have profound biological effects:

There is growing, if still preliminary, evidence that rape and early sexual trauma can indeed “stay in the body” — even stay in the vagina — and change the body on the most intimate, systemic level. Recovery is possible, but treatment should be specialized. Rape and early sex abuse can indeed permanently change the working of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) — so crucial for female arousal; and, if she is not supported by the right treatment, it can permanently alter the way a woman breathes, the rate of her heart, her blood pressure, and her startle reaction, in a manner that is not under any conscious control.

Even more strikingly, some studies have found that elevated SNS activation is linked to a variety of health hazards seemingly unrelated to sexual trauma, including vertigo, motor control and balance issues, visual processing problems, and elevated startle response. In other words, sexual abuse alters the brain in a way that sabotages multiple body systems and damages healthy stress response. Wolf recapitulates the implications poignantly:

Understood in this way, and with this significant evidence, rape and sexual assault, with their attendant trauma, should be understood not just as a form of forced sex; they should also be understood as a form of injury to the brain and body, and even as a variant of castration.

Demonstrating just how strong the connection between mind and body is, Korean researchers discovered that stress and sexual trauma actually affect, on a biological level, the very functioning of the vagina. Studying female rats, they found that “chronic physical stress modifies [sexual behavior] through a mechanism believed to involve complex changes in sex hormones, endocrine factors, and neurotransmitters.” What’s more, they were able to identify the precise biological mechanism responsible for this deep-seated interplay:

Evidently nitric oxide (NO) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) play important roles in vaginal and clitoral engorgement — helping the smooth muscle of the vagina relax and the vaginal tissues swell in preparation for arousal and orgasm — and these chemicals and their actions are inhibited when females are negatively stressed.

The researchers found that the stressed-out female rats were less receptive and more hostile to their male partners, displaying measurable aggression and irritability, and ultimately refusing to copulate. Stress, it turns out, diminished the female rats’ ability to reach arousal by greatly impairing their genital blood flow. The scientists concluded:

In animal model studies, mental or physical stress increases the level of serum catecholamines, thereby causing vascular contraction, which in turn reduces blood flow and leads to sexual dysfunction. . . . Since stress is concomitant with an increased output of catecholamines in blood . . . it is reasonable to assume that blood flow to the genital organs reduces during periods of stress. . . . [W]e measured norepinephrine as an indirect index of catecholamine level and found that it increased in the stress group and decreased in the recovery group. This result indirectly supports the suggestion that stress affects female genital blood flow.

Most ominous of all was the projection that if such stress levels were sustained over time, the physiological changes they cause would eventually affect the vaginal tissue itself. Indeed, researchers tested those tissues after the female rats were dead and found “biologically measurable changes.”

Women, of course, are not rats, but this only means that the effects of such stress are even more profound. Wolf argues that besides impairing women’s ability to reach orgasm, “bad stress” also affects the overall capacity for joy, hopefulness, and creativity. Unlike rats, humans are also susceptible to forms of abuse beyond the physical — Wolf cites the tragically prevalent cultural tendency to deride the vagina and its owner, embedded even in the slang we have for female genitalia. She writes:

The role of manipulating female stress in targeting the vagina should not be ignored. This behavior—ridiculing the vagina—makes perfect instinctive sense. These acts are often impersonal and tactical—strategies for directing a kind of pressure at women that is not consciously understood but may be widely intuited, and even survive in folk memory, as eliciting a wider neuropsychological “bad stress” response that actually debilitates women.

She cites one particularly unsettling example:

In 2010, male Yale students gathered at a “Take Back the Night” event, where their female classmates were marching in a group, protesting against sexual assault. The young men chanted at the protesters, “No means yes and yes means anal.” Some of the young women brought a lawsuit against the university, arguing that tolerating such behavior created an unequal educational environment. Ethically they are in the right, and neurobiologically they are right as well. Almost all young women who face a group of their male peers chanting such slogans are likely to feel instinctively slightly panicked. On some level they are getting the message that they may be in the presence of would-be rapists — making it impossible to shrug off immature comments, as women are often asked to do. They sense there is a wider risk to them that is being threatened, and indeed there is, but it is not just the risk of sexual assault. If they are stressed regularly in this way, they will indeed depress the whole subtle and delicate network of neurobiological triggers and reactions that make them feel good, happy, competent, and as if they know themselves.

One study termed the complex and lasting effects of such stress, an increasingly recognizable medical pattern, “multisystem dysfunction” — and it can effect such a wide array of physical health issues as higher risk of diabetes and heart disease, hormonal imbalances, and fertility problems. But the most damaging consequences of these physical changes, Wolf argues, are cognitive and psychoemotional:

The female body reacts in the same way to “bad stress” whether the context is the birthing room or the university or the workplace. If the female brain senses that an environment is not safe, its stress response inhibits all the same organs and systems, regardless of setting. Many of the signals that either stoke or diminish female desire have to do with the female brain’s question: Is it safe for her?

So if a woman goes to work or to study in a sexually dangerous or threatening atmosphere day after day, she risks — because of the cumulative, long-term effect of that “bad stress” — having the letting-go, creative “relaxation response” inhibited even outside her work or school environment.

If you sexually stress a woman enough, over time, other parts of her life are likely to go awry; she will have difficulty relaxing in bed eventually, as well as in the classroom or in the office. This in turn will inhibit the dopamine boost she might otherwise receive, which would in turn prevent the release of the chemicals in her brain that otherwise would make her confident, creative, hopeful, focused — and effective, especially relevant if she is competing academically or professionally with you. With this dynamic in mind, the phrase “fuck her up” takes on new meaning.

The vagina responds to the sense of female safety, in that circulation expands, including to the vagina, when a woman feels she is safe; but the blood vessels to the vagina constrict when she feels threatened. This may happen before the woman consciously interprets her setting as threatening. So if you continually verbally threaten or demean the vagina in the university or in the workplace, you continually signal to the woman’s brain and body that she is not safe. “Bad” stress is daily raising her heart rate, pumping adrenaline through her system, circulating catecholamines, and so on. This verbal abuse actually makes it more difficult for her to attend to the professional or academic tasks before her.

Yet despite the compelling scientific evidence, the most moving and encompassing point Wolf makes is an anthropological one:

The way in which any given culture treats the vagina — whether with respect or disrespect, caringly or disparagingly — is a metaphor for how women in general in that place and time are treated.



Vagina: A New Biography is absolutely fascinating in its entirety. For a less scientific but no less pause-giving take, complement it with The Big Feminist BUT: Comics about Women, Men and the Ifs, Ands & Buts of Feminism, then revisit Susan Sontag on sex.

 

SOURCE

CIA Sanctioned Disclosure of Time Travel & Mars Bases in 2016 Presidential Bid

In part two of this series, it was claimed that CIA “White Hats” had begun in 1980 to groom Barack Obama as a future U.S. President, while simultaneously grooming Andrew Basiago to follow him some time after into the White House.

Basiago’s path to the Presidency would follow a different trajectory than Obama’s more traditional grass roots political career in one of the two major U.S. political parties. Basiago would instead become a whistleblower and disclose his involvement in two classified programs – Project Pegasus and a CIA Jump Room Program to Mars. Basiago’s disclosure testimony would subsequently underpin his “Truth Campaign” to become U.S. President.

If Basiago’s claims are accurate about he and Obama being groomed as future Presidents, which includes what the CIA “White Hats” exposed Basiago to during his childhood and early adulthood, then what is the ultimate agenda of these alleged “White Hats”?

For an answer, we need to return to Basiago’s core claim that one of the purposes of the time travel technologies was to identify future U.S. Presidents. In part one, it was pointed out that during Project Pegasus, a number of U.S. Presidents and Vice Presidents were “pre-identified” and then briefed by CIA/DARPA personnel, after which Basiago met them during informal lunches.

Later, during the Mars Jump Room training, Basiago claims that he and Obama were also pre-identified as future Presidents. This is a perplexing scenario given Basiago’s claim that he and Barack Obama were sent to Mars to basically only maintain a specified threshold of humans physically present, while escaping life threatening situations from marauding Martian predators. They were told:

“Simply put, your task is to be seen and not eaten.”

Why would two allegedly pre-identified U.S. Presidents to come, be treated in such a dangerous and callous way?

One answer is that such experiences were part of the “grooming” of Obama and Basiago for their future roles. Both would be taught to fear the power of their CIA handlers, who had the power of life and death over them. Arguably, such experiences would make them more amenable to CIA influence if they succeeded in being voted into high political office.

Yet such an answer doesn’t satisfactorily explain why some pre-identified future Presidents would be exposed to a classified space program involving Mars, when other Presidents like Kennedy, Carter and Clinton, were denied access to similar information.

In the case of President Kennedy, his efforts to get access to classified UFO files were a direct factor in his assassination through the direct complicity of the CIA as discussed in the book, Kennedy’s Last Stand.
There is also credible testimony that President Carter was flatly denied access to classified UFO files by the outgoing Director of the CIA, George H.W. Bush.

In the case of President Clinton, he appointed a close friend, Webster Hubbell, to the third most senior Department of Justice position, in order to find answers to two questions: “One, who killed JFK? And two, are there UFOs?”

Why would Barack Obama, for example, have been given access to such highly classified information, when it was denied to Kennedy, Carter and Clinton?

Was Basiago subjected to mind control to make him believe events concerning Obama and teleportation to Mars occurred as he recalled, or was being told? In this regard, he does acknowledge “that people were brainwashed when they entered these kinds of projects and when they left.”

Did such brainwashing happen with Basiago? If so, it is possible that Basiago’s recollections of Barack Obama’s participation in the Mars Jump Room Project was contrived by his CIA handlers.

In part two, it was pointed out that investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, in 2010, was the first to raise the possibility that Obama was groomed by the CIA to become a future President. Was Basiago brainwashed to include the Mars teleportation element to Obama’s background to muddy the waters so Madsen’s earlier claim could be more easily discredited?
While possible, there is significant evidence supporting Basiago’s version of events here.

Obama did attend Occidental College in Los Angeles at the time Basiago claims that he, Obama and others were traveling to a secret jump room facility at 999 N. Sepulveda Boulevard in El Segundo, California in 1980. The distance between Occidental College and El Segundo is approximately 25 miles.

Also, according to Basiago, Obama used the name Barry Soetoro during his participation in the CIA Mars Jump Room Program. This is supported by researchers who have found college transcripts showing Obama did use that name in the past, including his time at Occidental College.

Finally, two other whistleblowers, Brett Stillings and Bernard Mendez have come forward to confirm their participation in the Mars Jump Room program, and Barack Obama’s involvement. They support Basiago’s claim that Obama used the name Barry Soetaro during the covert program.

Incredibly, Basiago may have been right all along that Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, was a participant in a classified CIA project where participants were led to believe they were secretly traveling to Mars through classified teleportation technologies. Whether they actually travelled to Mars or not, it’s possible that Obama was recruited and trained as a CIA asset during his time at Occidental College. This is consistent with what Madsen had earlier claimed about the Obama CIA link.

One thing is clear from Basiago’s narration of events recalled from his youth during Project Pegasus, and later from the CIA Mars Jump Room program. Principal CIA figures, including his father (Raymond Basiago), were in favor of disclosure of the time travel and jump room technologies, and encouraged Basiago down a path towards that end.

The picture that emerges of the CIA clandestine services branch is very benign, to say the least. The CIA is involved in the development of time travel and jump room technologies for intelligence gathering purposes, and has key officials encouraging Basiago to believe he will be a future President with the power to one day disclose such technologies to the world.

Andrew Basiago for U.S. President

This takes us back to the December 19 announcement of Andrew Basiago running for U.S. President. He is running as a write-in candidate in those 43 states that allow this. The cost of being on the ballot for all 50 states is estimated to be $5 million, and Basiago rightly objects to paying such an exorbitant amount to simply present an alternative choice to the U.S public.

Basiago clearly believes his 2016 candidacy is a serious bid. This is based on his insider knowledge about his foreseen future role, discovered within a number of classified programs run by the CIA and DARPA of which he was a participant.

While Basiago’s 2016 Presidential campaign appears quixotic at the moment, even a partial disclosure of an extraterrestrial cover-up by government authorities would lead to a powerful public reaction against major political parties.

Such a reaction could give momentum to Basiago’s candidacy for 2016, or perhaps 2020, potentially raising it to a more serious level, given the public’s desire for the truth to be revealed. The detailed testimony of Basiago would reveal some of this desired truth.
What is worth keeping in mind in contemplating these future possibilities is that the CIA, according to Basiago, has gathered intelligence on such scenarios through time-travel technologies. Just as the CIA allegedly groomed Obama to be President, similarly, “White Hats” in the CIA have groomed Basiago to play the whistleblower role he is currently playing.

Basiago has declared that he is leading a “Truth campaign” in his 2016 Presidential bid. Yet another powerful force appears to be a covert CIA operation, which according to Basiago’s testimony, pre-identified him decades ago as a future President promoting an extraterrestrial and secret space program disclosure platform.

While Basiago clearly believes he was, and perhaps still is, supported by “White Hats” in the CIA, there are good reasons why even alleged CIA White Hats should not be trusted. While as a child and young adult, Basiago clearly believed that his father and other alleged CIA White Hats were telling him the truth, there is no reason why the general public should accept this belief. He may very likely have been subjected to mind control to alter his memories of past or future events.

Basiago’s detailed testimony about his involvement in two classified programs run by the CIA does reveal important and significant information about key personnel, events and institutions involved in these programs. The sheer volume of details and information he has released is very impressive, while his subsequent investigations, along with supporting witnesses, suggests that a significant portion of it is accurate.

Consequently, Basiago appears to be a genuine whistleblower and understandably believes that his 2016 Presidential run is the real deal. Yet, Basiago, by his own testimony, was pre-identified and groomed as a future whistleblower by the CIA to reveal information about classified projects. His disclosures appear to be part of a psychological operation with a big long term agenda, which of course includes depicting the CIA in very favorable terms.

Basiago’s 2016 Presidential campaign is therefore very likely a part of a CIA sanctioned “limited disclosure” program concerning extraterrestrial life and secret space programs. There is a vast amount additional information about secret space programs and extraterrestrial life that his disclosures omit.

For example, Basiago does not discuss the role of German Secret Societies and the Nazi SS in pioneering the first space and time travel technologies, and infiltrating the U.S. military industrial complex in the 1950’s. There are significant differences between “limited” and “full disclosure” scenarios, as discussed at length in the book Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Alliances.

While evidence suggests Basiago has released valuable information about the development and use of time travel, and teleportation technologies, there is good reason to be very cautious about supporting his “Truth campaign” with its “limited disclosure” scenario influenced by CIA “White Hats.”

Andrew Basiago’s 2016 Presidential campaign opens the door to illuminating a covert world of secret space programs and extraterrestrial life. We should all be thankful for his public disclosures and attempt to bring these issues into the 2016 Presidential race as a serious topic. Ultimately, this can aid the much bigger “full disclosure” scenario as truth breaks free from its CIA shackles.

Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. December 29, 2015

Further Reading

Jump Room to Mars: Did CIA Groom Obama & Basiago as future Presidents? – Part 2 in 3 part series

Alleged Time Traveler Runs for U.S. President: Real Deal or CIA PsyOp? – Part 1 in 3 part series.

Mars whistleblower reveals more of his covert military service

Humans on Mars: Obama makes pledge in State of the Union

Andy Basiago – Life on Mars whistleblower or crackpot?

Research finds an unexpected link between religion and evolution

29/12/2015

Are we ‘programmed’ to believe in God? 

 

According to new research, it is possible that mankind is ‘hardwired’ to be religious, and the cause of this is EVOLUTION. According to an Oxford University Professor, fear of gods could have helped shape mankind into what we are today. This means that Religion could very well be the result of evolution.

The fear of God’s wrath could have played a key role in the evolutionary development of humans.

If belief in divine retribution is so entrenched among humans it is because evolution, writes Dominic Johnson, an expert in evolutionary biology and in international relations from Oxford University, in his new book ‘God is watching you’.

God Is Watching You:

-Proposes a new theory of the origins and evolution of not only religion, but also human cooperation and society.

-Explores how fear of supernatural punishment exists within and outside of religious contexts.

-Uses an interdisciplinary approach that draws on new research from anthropology, evolutionary biology, experimental psychology, and neuroscience.

According to Professor Johnsons theory, the feeling of being watched by a powerful supernatural being could have been the cause that our ancestors behaved in a less selfish way. Johnson believes that belief in divine punishment would have helped enhance cooperation among humans, one of the key traits that is based on the evolutionary success of our species. Likewise, Professor Johnson explains why fear of punishment would have become a more important force in religion than other aspects, such as love and altruism. According to him, this is mainly due to the way our brains establish links.

Professor Johnson says, in his new book ‘God is Watching You’ that that enigmatic belief in divine punishment is something that has been hardwired into us by ‘evolution’ and is one of the main causes that led to the creation and development of ALL world religions.

‘The ability to anticipate rewards or punishments arising from our behavior would clearly have been favored by Darwinian natural selection, because it promoted survival and reproduction,’ he said.

‘I argue this extended to the anticipation of supernatural reward and punishment.’

‘God-fearing people were better able to avoid raising the ire of their fellow man, lowering the costs of real world sanctions, and raising the rewards of co-operation.’

‘It offers a striking twist on the old science and religion debate – religion is not an alternative to evolution, it is a product of evolution.’

According to psychological research, it is shown that negative events in human life tend to have a much more powerful impact on our thinking and behavior than positive ones.

Professor Johnson added: ‘When humans evolved the capacity for complex language and theory of mind – the ability to know what others’ know – our behavior became increasingly transparent and selfish behavior and social transgressions risked increasing costs from retaliation or reputational damage.’

‘Avoiding these costs ushered in a new era in which the suppression of selfishness became a vital ingredient of an individual’s evolutionary success.’

‘The idea that one’s good and bad deeds will be observed, judged and rewarded or punished by God or some other supernatural agent is a recurring feature of virtually all of the world’s religions, both past and present.’

‘The looming threat of supernatural punishment deterred selfish behavior and increased cooperation, and this was a good thing for individuals as well as society.’

SOURCE

Satan’s Eden

"It is difficult to understand how anyone who has studied animals could come to the conclusion that they do not feel; and more difficult still to understand how any man who professes to have been moved by the compassion of God could believe and teach that we need not consider the feelings of the other species, as they are only things-mere chattels. Yet men do believe such things and teach them. And when we realise how much the doctrine is held in 'high places' it is not to be wondered that cruelty abounds, and our fellow-creatures are made to pass through the fire of unspeakable suffering as sacrifices to the Moloch of human lust and scientific insanity." Rev. J.Todd Ferrier-On Behalf of the Creatures.

Satan's Eden

Ancient texts tell us that man was once a god-like being and lived in a Golden Age of wholeness. An age of sacred sympathy with all manifested beings, kinship with all life. A reality where there was no need for speech for all shared the telepathic language of instant understanding; a world where we could manifest anywhere on our planet with just a thought.

So how did we lose Paradise? What was the nature of our Fall-did some insane entity from another state of being interfere with our genetics- close down our god-like abilities? Did this being create a counterfeit world of tetrahedral fractals as a back drop for its construct? See 'Shattering the Illusion of Reality'.

The Fall of Man

In the book of Genesis there are two creation stories. The original creation was one of sacred sympathy with life as we read in Gen 1, 29-30. "And the Elohim said, "Behold we have given you every herb-bearing seed, which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed: to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to everything that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is a living soul, we have given every green herb; and it was so. And the Elohim of God saw everything they had made, and behold it was very good." Gen. 1, 29-30.

Many theologians agree that man before 'The Fall' was a vegetarian and lived in harmony with creation. So why did the human race fall from grace; become carnivorous and divorced from nature?

The answer may be found in Gen vi, 1-8 which talks of the interbreeding between the daughters of man and the sons of God the Nephilim. It would seem that after the appearance of the Nephilim everything changed. Wholeness was lost, oneness was split into duality and man fell. He lost his sacred sympathy with all life, and in his blindness was led into evil by the Demiurge...Lucifer who wanted his own Creation...one of strife and murder, the virtual reality game we call the third dimension. See Life-the Ultimate Deception.

Gen ix. 2-6: "And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air; with all wherewith the ground teemeth, and all the fishes of the sea, into your hands are they delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be food for you; as the green herb have I given you all."

Rev J Todd Ferrier in his book On behalf of the Creatures has this to say:

"Here carnivorism is an acknowledged fact in man and beast! Every moving thing was for food! What a FALL there was from the first moral world dominion to the brute-force here revealed!"

The warning of the prophets

The sacrifice and eating of animals was challenged by many prophets in the scriptures. Isaiah repeatedly charged the Jews with carnivorism: "Your hands are full of blood. Wash you, make clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes. 1 v10-15, and again, lix v 3, "For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity.

He that killeth an ox is as he that killeth a man. lxvi v3, is a full interpretation of the much ignored and much abused commandment 'Thou shalt not kill.'- not simply human beings but beasts also, which are living souls according to the writer of Genesis. Isaiah's words captivate our senses and fill our imagination with magnificent dreams of a redeemed earth, from which Carnivorism will be banished: "The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fattling together; and a little child shall lead them." Isaiah xi v 6-8

Organised religion

Islam, Catholicism and Christianity all have their root in the sacrificial, blood soaked dogma of Judaism and animals have yet to come within the bounds of their compassion. And meanwhile: everywhere the poor, patient, dumb creatures endure every kind of torment with hardly a single word being uttered on their behalf by the teachers of religion. In the words of the Rev Holmes-Gore: "It is horrible-damnable. And the true reason of it all is because the beasts are popularly believed to be soulless."

But the scriptures say otherwise: In Gen. 1, 29-30, we are told that all living things have souls.

The Rev Holmes-Gore has this to say in his book: These we have not Loved: "If the creatures have souls, then it is clear that flesh-eating is a form of cannibalism, and differs from it in degree rather than principle. The more one thinks about it the more obvious it becomes that the only excuse for carnivorism is the false hypothesis that animals were created solely for men to use for the purpose of food, clothing and sport. Once this assumption is seen to be entirely false, the sheer barbarism of flesh-eating becomes glaringly obvious."

Taking responsibility

If those who eat flesh were forced to slay their own prey, or watch a butcher at work in a slaughterhouse, and then proceed to the dinner table, perhaps a few of them would realise the nature of their crime against en-souled creatures. Thoughtlessness, apathy and selfishness are the main causes for the continuance of atrocities against the animal nations that share our reality.

There are many justifications for flesh eating. We are told by the status quo that man is a meat eater and flesh food is necessary for strength. But many of the strongest creatures, the ox, the horse and the elephant are all vegetarians. Our bodies are not constructed to eat flesh...we do not have a short bowel to quickly expel the rot, neither do we have retractable claws or rapid respiration, and when our blunt half formed canine teeth are compared to the sharp fangs of a carnivore...it would seem obvious that we were not designed to tear and rent flesh.

Another argument against the humane diet is this: In nature everything preys upon something else and so man cannot be expected to do otherwise.

If we are to take nature as our guide to our conduct, we shall end by practicing cannibalism and rape. Man was not originally designed to be a killer as we see in Gen. 1, but a compassionate godlike being.

Another argument that is raised goes like this: Those of us who choose to 'live and let live' are accused of inconsistency.

The Rev Holmes-Gore has this to say: "It is said that even the strictest vegetarian is bound to destroy life, so why try to avoid doing so. Thus, every time he drinks a glass of water he swallows millions of tiny organisms, and he cannot walk on the grass without squashing insects and other living entities. Indeed, so humane are some flesh eaters that they say it is even cruel to cut and eat cabbages. This is mere sophistry. One might as well argue that since one is bound to kill something one cannot reasonably be expected to stop short of murder."

The Understanding

“Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages.” Thomas A. Edison.

The world 'outside' is a mirror image of the' inner world', and if we are to address the horrific violence and cruelties so rampant in our age, we must consider our treatment of animals. The billions of souls slaughtered for food; the millions of poor creatures subjected to the cruelty and pain of vivisection, fashion and cosmetics, and those that are horribly used for murderous pastimes called sport. The earth groans with the blood and suffering of the creatures and because our reality is a mirror of our degraded consciousness our world reflects our lack of compassion: war, pain, horror and misery are our lot. We have become so de-sensitised to the sufferings of slaughtered creatures that we never give a thought what it must cost in suffering to the lamb, the calf, the pig and chickens that we devour at our dinner tables.The suffering of mankind in the mirror of causation is but an echo of the screams of the creatures.

As ye do unto them...so it shall be done unto you. The Law of the Universe is just and karma will be visited upon the heads of the guilty...life after life until the energetic debt is paid. See my article The Karma of Cruelty.

Opting out of the violence

We are at the end of a Grand Cosmic Year and have the opportunity to graduate from this reality. [see my article The Winter Solstice] We are given a choice to choose love or hate: to choose to take life or to protect it. Many are awakening to the true nature of our so called' civilised world'. Many are listening to the Voice of the Heart and regaining a sacred sympathy towards all life. This is the Shift of Ages-reconnecting with our Divine Nature, a return to the Paradise we lost.

The Clarion Call

A wind has blown across the earth and tremors shake its frame.

New things are struggling to their birth and naught remains the same.

The earth is weary of its past. Of folly hate and fear.

Behind a dark and stormy sky. The dawn of God is near. H.C.Happold.

The dawn of God is the re-unification of all life. In the words of The Shining Brother- St Francis of Assisi:

"My son[daughter] in the spirit you understand me. I feel to ye as to one who understands me, to whom I need hardly speak in words, so deep is the sympathy between us."

A thought for the flowering of our spirits in 2016

"I have the feeling that my boat has struck down there in the depths against some great thing-

And nothing happens.

Nothing...silence...waves...nothing.

Or, has everything happened, and are we standing quietly now in the new life? Juan Ramon Jiminez

28 December 2015

ethompson

Both the Pope and the Queen Warns This May Be Our Last Christmas

December 21, 2015

Pope Francis told crowds in St. Peter’s Square that this Christmas might be the last one for humanity.

In a grim speech, the Pope said that the current chaotic state of the world marks the beginning of the “end times”, and that this time next year the world is likely to be unrecognisable.

Francis, who previously announced the beginning of World War 3, had labelled this year’s Christmas as a “charade” during a Mass at the Casa Santa Maria earlier in the month.

“We are close to Christmas. There will be lights, there will be parties, bright trees, even Nativity scenes – all decked out – while the world continues to wage war,” he said earlier in December.

The Pontiff, who turned 79 on Thursday, elaborated on his views this weekend, telling a crowd, “While the world starves, burns, and descends further into chaos, we should realise that this year’s Christmas celebrations for those who choose to celebrate it may be their last“.
 
“Unless the path to peace is recognised, we must weep for those innocent victims who grow by the day, and ask God for forgiveness. As Jesus and God weeps, I do too“.

SOURCE



Dec 26, 2015

The Queen dropped a bombshell yesterday while filming her annual Christmas Message for the BBC, hinting at deep personal regrets over the murder of Princess Diana, a BBC insider claims.

Clearly troubled, the Queen said, “She knew too much.” The Queen asked her subjects to understand that the Royal Family simply did what was necessary to ensure their own survival.

Senior BBC production staff and palace advisors scrambled to cancel the take, but not before the Queen expressed dark fears that this will be the last Christmas on earth because malevolent forces, much stronger than her own, are stalking across Europe, gaining ground every day. “I hope you enjoy your final Christmas,” she said bitterly, before BBC staff, under strict orders from palace advisors, cancelled the take and sent junior staff on an early lunch.
Later in the day the Christmas message was re-done, the second take proving less troubling to the establishment…

SOURCE

US military provided Assad with intel on extremists via Russia, Israel and Germany

22 Dec, 2015

The Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff has been indirectly providing Syrian military with intelligence on Islamic extremists fearing the Obama administration’s agenda to oust Bashar Assad will engender total chaos in Syria.

A new investigation in the London Review of Books by renowned American journalist Seymour M. Hersh exposes the divide between the US top brass and the politicians in the White House when it comes to dealing with Islamic extremists in Syria and Iraq.

It seems the US JCS isn’t enthusiastic about Obama’s “Assad must go” maxima, opting to provide Damascus with intelligence and analytics on the jihadists instead. This is, however, done indirectly, an unidentified former senior adviser to the Joint Chiefs told Hersh.

In summer 2013, a highly classified report prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the JCS assessed that ousting President Assad would create chaos in the country, making it an easy prey for Islamic extremists.

By that time, the CIA had been delivering weapons from Libyan arms depots to Syria via Turkey for over a year. This began soon after the assassination of Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi, writes Hersh.

The arms were handed to any group opposing Assad’s military, including Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State. The so-called ‘moderate rebels’ had “evaporated and the Free Syrian Army was a rump group stationed at an airbase in Turkey,” the source told the journalist. The US military assessment was realistic: moderate opposition to Assad is a myth and the US was arming Islamic extremists.

Turkey boosts arms supplies to Syria terrorists in exchange for oil & antiques – Damascus https://t.co/hCVK9RJOL0pic.twitter.com/hUn38gIm4T— RT (@RT_com) November 29, 2015

The DIA’s former head, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, recalled the report “got enormous pushback” from the Obama administration, which “did not want to hear the truth.”

“If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic,” Flynn said.

READ MORE: Ex-US military intel chief: Washington's strategy against ISIS narrow & one-dimensional

“The JCS believed that Assad should not be replaced by fundamentalists,” the former JCS adviser told Hersh.

Under the circumstances, the US military realized that a direct challenge to Obama’s policy was doomed to failure, so the Pentagon’s, General Martin Dempsey, allegedly decided to oppose the extremists without using “political channels.”

READ MORE: Lavrov: Unclear what exactly US is doing in Syria & why results so insignificant

To fight the common enemy of Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State, US intelligence was provided to third party militaries, such as Germany, Israel and Russia.

“It was clear that Assad needed better tactical intelligence and operational advice,” the former JCS adviser told Hersh, noting, “Obama didn’t know, but Obama doesn’t know what the JCS does in every circumstance and that’s true of all presidents.”

The adviser stressed there was no direct contact between the US and the Syrian military.

Basic needs: Pentagon envisions a chain of ‘anti-ISIS hubs’ https://t.co/rPMOYyO6ygpic.twitter.com/YmO2Wdup4F— RT (@RT_com) December 11, 2015

“It was a military to military thing, and not some sort of a sinister Joint Chiefs’ plot to go around Obama and support Assad,” the source said. “If Assad remains in power… it’s because he was smart enough to use the intelligence and sound tactical advice we provided to others.”

With the full knowledge of Syrian intelligence, the US embassy in Syria had spent millions of dollars over a long period financing dissidents aiming to destabilize the country. These efforts took place while President Bashar Assad was trying to establish friendly relations with Washington.

Following the 9/11 terror attack, “Bashar was, for years, extremely helpful to us while, in my view, we were churlish in return, and clumsy in our use of the gold he gave us,” a longtime consultant to America’s intelligence community told Hersh.

By 2002, Assad had turned over large amounts of information regarding the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities in Syria and Germany. In the same year, Syrian intelligence foiled an Al-Qaeda attack on the headquarters of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain.

Hersh alleges that at the time a Damascus prison was used for torturing terrorist suspects held captive by the CIA, as was happening in other countries involved in its secret rendition program.

However, despite Assad’s generous support the White House’s attitude towards the Syrian leader remains the same – negative.

The American journalist alleges that, in return for the US Joint Chiefs intelligence-sharing arrangement, Damascus was to accept four conditions: restrain Hezbollah from attacking Israel; renew dialogue with Israel over the Golan Heights; agree to accept “Russian and other outside military advisers,” and promise to hold open elections after the war.

A source in Moscow told Hersh the Israeli’s refused to discuss the Golan Heights issue, saying: “Assad is finished.”

Allegedly, Assad had attempted to have Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan toppled, the head of Saudi Arabian intelligence and national security affairs. Naturally, the US turned down demands to get rid of a man who had spent over 20 years as the Saudi’s Washington ambassador.

READ MORE: Behind the Saudi crack-up

Seymour M. Hersh says the US military’s success in providing Damascus with quality intelligence and curbing terrorist potential by supplying outdated arms from Turkish depots via CIA routes was undermined by the actions of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey. These countries armed Islamic extremists with modern weapons, which gave them the upper hand in subduing the Syrian Army and resulted in huge territorial losses by 2013.

While the Saudis allegedly remained negotiable, the Turkish government and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan were playing another game.

Russia says Turkey’s Erdogan & family involved in illegal ISIS oil trade https://t.co/tBm2YCyhZwpic.twitter.com/ZoeOUKzwYH— RT (@RT_com) December 3, 2015

After supporting Jabhat al-Nusra for years, the JCS adviser said the Erdogan government is “now doing the same for Islamic State” in order to disrupt the balance in the Middle East.

The Turkish government has refused to halt the flow of foreign jihadists going through Turkey because President Erdogan “is dreaming big – of restoring the Ottoman Empire – and he did not realize the extent to which he could be successful in this.”

SOURCE 

Siemens Implicated in Tracking Forced Labor and Slaves in Space

An immoral past follows the Siemens multinational corporation, currently Europe’s largest engineering company, which assisted the Nazis by using slave labor to build advanced weapons during World War II. The collapse of Hitler’s Third Reich put an end to a dark chapter in Siemens past – according to conventional historians. Not so, according to the claims of two whistleblowers whose testimonies lead to a disturbing conclusion. Siemens has been involved in secretly building billions of tiny RFID chips to track the movement of abducted humans used as forced labor in secret space colonies and in a galactic slave trade.

Siemens’ role in helping Nazi Germany build advanced weapons for the Second World War is well known, but less known is the extent to which it participated in the use of slave labor. On September 24, 1998, Siemens decided to begin compensating victims of its former slave labor practices as the following Associated Press Report describes:

Siemens announced plans Wednesday for a $12-million fund to compensate former slave laborers forced to work for the firm by the Nazis during World War II…. Almost a year ago, at its 150th anniversary celebrations, the company had insisted that it could do no more for its former slave laborers than express “deepest regrets.” The Munich-based Siemens said its fund is in addition to the $4.3 million it paid to the Jewish Claims Conference in 1961 and to providing humanitarian help for victims. Siemens estimates that between 10,000 and 20,000 slave laborers worked in its wartime factories.

Siemens’ role in acknowledging its wartime use of slave labor and efforts to compensate victims is praiseworthy. However, the acknowledgement came forty years after the events in question, and leads to troubling questions over whether the company was sincere or simply wishing to avoid class action lawsuits then underway in the United States:

The threat of lawsuits has raised the pressure on German firms to pay direct claims to the thousands of concentration camp inmates, mostly Jews, forced to work in their factories. Lawyers representing former slave laborers criticized Siemens, as they did Volkswagen, for setting up a fund to avoid larger payments a lawsuit might demand. Siemens is seeking “the cheapest alternative,” said Munich attorney Michael Witti, who with a colleague filed the U.S. lawsuit.

Readers might be forgiven for believing that the compensation of former slave laborers is an issue associated with a terrible chapter in our recent history. However, there is whistleblower testimony that such practices continue and Siemens is still involved.

William Pawelec was a computer operations and programming expert with the USAF, who started his own electronics security company, and worked for high profile U.S. defense contractors such as SAIC and EG&G. He received high level security clearances and had access to many classified projects.

Prior to 2001, Pawelec decided to reveal what he knew about deep black projects that he believed were hiding advanced technologies from the U.S. public. He gave an interview to Dr. Steven Greer with the strict instruction that it would only be published after his death. He died on May 22, 2007 and the video was published posthumously on December 14, 2010.

Among his many revelations is information concerning the development of the first electronic RFID tracking chips that were developed as early as 1979 according to Pawelec. He explained the history of their development, and the role his Denver-based company played in setting up meetings with government agencies, which were interested in using the chips for security purposes.

In his video interview with Greer, Pawelec said:

At the time in the security industry, a lot of us had a lot of concerns about tracking and locating people that had been kidnapped. Particularly what was going on in Europe at the time where we were having NATO officers, even the Prime Minister of Italy, kidnapped … These people were drained [of information] or they were brutalized or both… One of the goals of the industry was to develop technology that would allow us to track these people or locate them quickly.

He said that the tracking chips, which were very small and shaped like a pill, had multiple functions:

Now this particular pill shaped device, very minute, had a lot of flexibility in its capabilities. It was basically almost a transponder. You could send a frequency to it and it would respond back with its unique number which could not be changed once the chip was made. Yet there were a lot of capabilities that could be added to this chip such as monitoring temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and even wave forms out of the brain.


Small RFID Chip compared to grain of rice. Image uploaded in 2009. Source: Wikipedia

Pawelec said that soon after demonstrating an even more sophisticated lithium niobate chip in 1984, which could be tracked from a distance of 120 kilometers in space, he discovered a small Silicon Valley company had been set up to manufacture billions of them. He learned that “after they had made billions and billions of these little chips” the factory was shut down a year later, and all information about the chips disappeared.

Pawelec said that the small company responsible for making the billions of tiny chips “was a division of a rather major European electronics firm that had the plant. Siemens.”

Pawelec went on to describe how his colleague, Bob, the former head of security for the U.S. State Department, was assassinated in Nairobi because he was getting too close to learning about the people that had acquired control over the tracking chips and had built billions of them for an unknown purpose.

According to Pawelec, the people behind Bob’s assassination had infiltrated the U.S. military industrial complex at its highest level, and could intimidate and silence anyone.

Pawelec’s testimony suggests that the Siemen’s corporation had acquired the rights and control over the tracking chip technology, built billions of them in less than a year using a U.S. subsidiary, and then arranged for the local manufacturing plant to close with all information about the tracking chips now gone.

Importantly, the Siemen’s corporation was associated with a powerful force embedded within the U.S. military industrial complex, which was intent on hiding the true purpose of the chips. This hidden force possessed the power to remove anyone who got too close to learning the truth, even the head of security at a U.S. Embassy.

It is worth repeating that the main function of the tiny chips, according to Pawelec, was to track people, and even monitor their key physiological processes over large distances. This leads to the question, why would the Siemen’s corporation need billions of chips to monitor people over large distances? For the answer, we need to turn to the testimony of another whistleblower.

Corey Goode claims to have worked for a number of secret space programs over a twenty year period from 1987 to 2007. He says that he was given access to “smart glass pads” that revealed the real history of humanity, especially events surrounding the end of the World War II.

In a nutshell, Goode claims that key elements of the Nazi regime had succeeded in developing a secret space program during the course of the war. The main power, however, lay not with Hitler’s SS, but with a number of German secret societies who used occult knowledge and their vast hidden wealth to build advanced antigravity space craft in remote locations in Antarctica and South America.

The German secret societies had built bases on the Moon and Mars even before the end of World War II. Subsequently, along with remnants of the Nazi SS advanced technologies division, which was headed by Hans Kammler, the Germans infiltrated the U.S. military industrial complex using Operation Paperclip scientists.

Major U.S. corporations were infiltrated along with many leading aerospace and engineering companies in Europe, Japan and elsewhere. The Siemens company, with its long history of association with Nazi Germany, was a natural conduit for the infiltration of the U.S. military industrial complex.

Pawelec had learned about the strange influence exercised over the U.S. military industrial complex by German elites when he traveled to the Tonopah Test Range for a classified project. After Pawelec’s death, his wife, Mary Joyce Annie DeRiso, shared more of the information that Pawelec had told her about the Tonopah incident, and who was really in control of the U.S. military.

DeRiso shared her information when she was being interviewed about Pawelec’s testimony in Greer’s Disclosure Project video:

His disenchantment began when he was called to give what he thought was going to be a regular project status report at Tonapah. The meeting was held in a heavily controlled room that was built like a Faraday cage making it impossible for communications to come in or out of the sealed room. Briefcases, papers, pagers and any form of identification were not allowed at that meeting… Only the generals could be recognized by their uniforms. The tension was really high and Bill was surprised at how nervous the high-ranking generals were. He knew something BIG was up. Bill saw a private jet escorted by two of our military jets land on the tarmac. Surprisingly, this private jet rolled all the way to the building where the meeting was scheduled as the escort jets departed. A very imposing man stepped out of the jet and entered the room. He was relatively tall, and wore a very expensive European suit. His shoes and briefcase were equally luxurious and there was an aide or bodyguard by his side. His demeanor was very aristocratic and he spoke with a High German accent. The room was electrified with nervous tension as each person gave his status report and answered questions.

When everyone had spoken, the German man thanked them for their good work and simply left. He was never introduced nor identified in anyway. It is believed he was Baron Jesco von Puttkamer, one of the Germans who came to the United States with Werner von Braun. Whatever happened that day convinced Bill that the United States, and probably the whole world, was being controlled by Europeans … but exactly who ‘they’ were was the big question.



It drove Bill and his friends on a quest to find out what was really going on. After that, he frequently quoted his friend Jim Marrs who often says, ‘The Nazis may have lost the battles but they won the war.’

Based on deRiso’s interview, Pawelec believed that remnants of the Nazi regime had survived World War II, and that German elites were now in control of Western Europe and the United States.

The testimony of Pawelec’s widow is significant since it reveals her husband’s final conclusion over who was really in control of the U.S. military industrial complex, was the same as what Corey Goode later revealed. This finally takes us to the question, what purpose did the Siemens company have for building billions of chips for tracking humans over long distances?

In an email interview, Goode described the development of a galactic slave trade that involved extraterrestrials and national elites secretly in control of Earth governments and militaries. This was achieved through a network of corporations, which he described as the Interplanetary Corporate Conglomerate (ICC):

The Secret Earth Governments and their Syndicates discovered that a large amount of humans were being taken off the planet by various ET’s anyway, so they decided to find a way to profit from it and have control over which people were being taken. In prior arrangements they were made promises of receiving technologies and biological specimens for allowing groups to abduct humans, but the ET’s rarely delivered on their promises. Once they had developed the advanced infrastructure (ICC) in our Sol System, along with advanced technologies (that some of the thousands of ET groups traveling through our system were now interested in obtaining) and now had the ability to deter most unwelcome guests from entering Earths airspace, the Cabal/ICC then decided to use human trafficking as one of their resources in interstellar bartering.

Goode’s revelation provides an answer as to why the Siemens company had built billions of trackable chips with unique identifiers. These chips were very likely used to monitor a galactic slave trade, and the use of forced labor on secret colonies on Mars and elsewhere in our solar system.

In 1998, the Siemens company confessed to its involvement in the Nazi practice of using slave labor and agreed to compensate those forced to work at Siemens. Siemens estimated the number to be between 10,000 to 20,000 victims. If the testimonies of Pawelec and Goode are accurate, then the number of victims of a continuing practice of secret forced labor and slave trade in space, numbers far far greater.

By tracking of victims in an illicit galactic slave trade, through tiny RFID chips, the Siemens corporation is complicit. Eventually, Siemens and any other corporations involved in exploiting forced labor in secret space colonies, or a galactic slave trade, will eventually have to confess to their involvement, face justice, and compensate victims in these vast undisclosed crimes against humanity.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

Obama Signs Law Protecting Corporate Crimes in Space until 2022

Mission to Mars investigates claims of slave labor at secret corporate base

Computer hacking linked to extraterrestrial disclosure & future War Crimes trials

Overthrowing a Mars Colony Dictator: British Elite Prepare for the Real Thing

Galactic Human Slave Trade & AI threat to End with Full Disclosure of ET Life

Corporate bases on Mars and Nazi infiltration of US Secret Space Program

Extraterrestrial contact: international law & crimes against humanity