Search This Blog

30 June 2012

The Reptilian Brain

by David Icke
May 2000
from DavidIcke Website
recovered through WayBackMachine Website
The Reptilian Brain. The Key to Understand The Illuminati and the World We line In?
"To know the Illuminati, Mr. David, you must study the Reptile"
Credo Mutwa

I had a message from someone recently claiming that what I say about humans having a reptilian brain is not true. In fact it was one of the most provable pieces of information I have written, as anyone who studies the brain will confirm.

But I thank the questioner because it prompted me to put together this package of information which not only shows that the reptilian brain exists - but also how vital it is to the manipulation of the world by the Illuminati-reptilian bloodlines.
As Credo Mutwa, the Zulu shaman, told me:
"To know the Illuminati, Mr. David, you must study the reptile."
It is important for people to know the basics about the reptilian brain because it (a) reveals where the character and attitudes of the Illuminati come from and (b) how and why we are manipulated mentally and emotionally in the way that we are through television and other imagery. It is to do with the manipulation of the reptilian part of the human brain.

There are three articles detailing the reptilian brain presented for you here. …and my comments are in (italics.)

Now we go below the surface "reality" of the neocortex and into parts of our brains which are still a great mystery to the infant "upstairs."
These intelligence centers have enabled life to survive in varied forms for millions of years. They are not to be discounted even if they don’t speak the language of the neocortex.

Again, I will be general.
The reptilian brain is the most ancient of the brains. It has two hemispheres, just like the neocortex, and it may be that they relate functionally to the left and right hemispheres of the neocortex. The reptilian brain consists of the upper part of the spinal cord and the basal ganglia, the diencephalon, and parts of the midbrain - all of which sits atop the spinal column like a knob in the middle of our heads.

It is thought to represent a fundamental core of the nervous system and derives from a form of mammal-like reptile that once ranged widely over the world but disappeared during the Triassic period having provided the evolutionary link between dinosaurs and mammals. All modern mammals have this reptilian complex, including humans.

(It was the interbreeding or fusing of reptilian DNA to mammal DNA which created the Illuminati reptilian-human hybrid bloodlines and allows the "purest" of this breed to move between human and reptilian form.)
First and foremost among the traits generated through the reptilian brain is the drive to establish and defend territory. This is fueled by an extremely potent "will-to-power", exemplified among lizards by the ritual behavior of two rainbow lizards competing for dominance. These animals have beautiful colors and like many lizards, use headbobbing and pushups in assertive, aggressive, courtship and greeting displays.
In a contest, once the gauntlet is thrown down, the aggressive displays give way to violent combat, and the struggle is unrelenting. In victory, they are tyrannical dictators in the extreme. In defeat, they lose their majestic colors, lapse into a kind of depression, and die two weeks later.

(This is classic Illuminati behaviour. Fighting each other and humanity to the death to impose their will and dominance. Winner takes it all)
At least five human behaviors originate in the reptilian brain. These have been denoted as isopraxic, preservative, re-enactment, tropistic, and deceptive.
Without defining them, I shall simply say that in human activities they find expression in:
  • obsessive-compulsive behavior
  • personal day-to-day rituals and superstitious acts
  • slavish conformance to old ways of doing things
  • ceremonial re-enactments
  • obeisance to precedent, as in legal, religious, cultural, and other matters
  • responding to partial representations (coloration, "strangeness," etc.), whether alive or inanimate
  • and all manner of deception
(If I had to do a quick summary of Illuminati behavior, it would be something like the above - the traits of the reptilian brain. Look at The Biggest Secret, my talk videos, and this website. They expose all of the consequences of this behavior - obsessively, compulsively, advancing their agenda at all costs; the obsession with rituals, ceremony, and symbolism; and…yes, yes… all manner of deception!) 
All movies and television likely are a projection of the reptilian brain. How so? Movies and television (video games, etc.) are all undeniably dreamlike, not only in their presentation of symbolic-reality, but also in that humans experiencing movies, etc. have the same brain wave patterns as when they are dreaming. And guess where dreaming originates in your head? In the reptilian brain (although other parts of our brains are involved).

(The movie and television industry is not only controlled by the reptilian bloodlines, it was created by them in the first place. The Illuminati are controlled by the traits of their reptilian brain and they seek to manipulate humanity through the manipulation and stimulation of the reptilian part of our brain.)
The "language" of the reptilian brain is visual imagery. All communications transferred by reptiles are done so by visual symbolic representations, each having specific meaning.

(Exactly. And what have I exposed again and again in my books and talks? How the Illuminati communicate with each other and to the human subconscious with endless symbolism and visual codes.)
Reptiles do not dream, but animals which have evolved from the reptiles (mammals & birds) do dream. Why? Because the reptilian mind is still operating in them and we humans call that mental state "dreaming." There is no "dreamstate" in reptiles because this mentality is their waking state.
It is repressed during our waking hours (but still functioning --- it never sleeps) by chemicals released neocortically--- then the reptilian is allowed to function during sleep and dream, when the left hemisphere is in turn repressed. But obviously, the reptilian brain is not satisfied being relegated to the "nightwatch" of an inert body. It wants far more than that.

Humans invented rituals and ceremonies, and then, theater. Now where do you suppose those revelations came from? Theater, with its famous theorem of the "suspension of disbelief" (which is simply another way of saying, "Put your left brain to sleep.") is a re-invention of the reptilian mental-state "out-there". And of course, now we have excellent duplication of the reptilian mindset with movies and television, etc.--- which by some estimates, occupies up to 16-18 hours of our time per day, when you add in sleep-dream time.

Ritual, ceremony, theater, movies, television, video games, etc.; all of which was created out of the territoriality need-compulsion and the will-to-power of the reptilian brain.

(All confirmation that the reptilian part of the human brain is the "battlefield" on which control of our reality and this planet is being contested.)
This "territoriality" and "will-to-power" is manifested in a variety of ways in human behavior, as are other reptilian traits. Let me give some examples, though you will soon realize that an abundance of examples is present in our civilization. "He" wants to marry her, and "She" might very well be interested, but they agree that before marriage can be considered, he must have a "good job" with a steady income and a "good future" - "They" are rainbow lizards (or any number of other reptiles, birds & mammals) whose "courtship" consists of the male showing his ability to establish and protect a certain "space" before he will be considered a suitable mate--- in short, this kind of compulsion/obsession is reptilian, no matter how much rationale the left brain of the neocortex applies to justify it.

(On the Leading Edge website, traits and consequences of the reptilian brain are listed as: consume, seek a mate, get married, breed, reproduce, fight, riot, obey, eat, kill, fear, worship, buy, drink, drugs, hate, compete, get more, guilt, sin, don’t cooperate, seek differences, sleep.

As you will see, "territoriality" extends far beyond a patch of earth in humans--- and "will-to-power" has many masks. "Us" attack "Them" because of their skin color. It is the color display that "Us" attack. "Us" are cock lizards (& countless other reptiles). All racism is reptilian.

(The Illuminati are obsessed with race and bloodline. This is one reason why they have interbred so obsessively over thousands of years. They are incredibly racist, which is why they are using "population control", famine, war, and disease to attack the populations of non-white countries, and indeed, to undermine the white peoples who are not part of their reptilian genetic network.)
"B. All" is attracted to "N. Doll" because "N. Doll" wears red lipstick. When "N. Doll" wears blue lipstick, "B. All" is uninterested. "B. All" is attracted to coloration - but color is not the only physical display involved in this compulsion. It could be any physical characteristic. "B. All" could be addicted to warts. "N. Doll" could be mesmerized by a certain walk.

And what about Mr. "B. All" who digs big breasts and tight buns? Or Miss "N. Doll" who likes big dicks and biceps? They are green anolis lizards who can only respond to some physical display - like a flared collar or a slim chassis. B. All and N. Doll are impotent without a hot mirage in front of their eyes. They can’t get off without Hollywood or Madison Avenue controlling their hormonal traffic; they don’t go cruising, they go vogue-ing. They are into drive-by orgasms. They are turned on and off by traffic lights.

So who’s doing the driving here?

All compulsive reactions of either attraction or aggression based on any physical display or representation is originated in the reptilian brain.

"Goo Rue" lives in a shallow cave on the top of an isolated mountain. "Goo Rue" follows a very simple daily routine from which he never strays. Most of his day is spent in prayer, basking in the radiation of his god (which, being "beyond words," is imaged at his altar as a serpent spiraling up a rod).
The rest of "Goo Rue’s" day is spent patiently foraging for food and "living on the moment." Frequently, "Goo" is visited by followers from near-by villages who prostrate themselves before him. "Goo Rue" speaks of "timelessness & body-lessness & regeneration." After eating, or after giving a particularly inspiring speech, "Goo Rue" has uncontrollable sexual urges, of which only young girls of the villages are aware. "Goo Rue" is a Komodo Dragon.

"Double-O-Dahlmer" is cool and emotionless. "Double-O-Dahlmer" is "Goo Rue’s" brother and lives on the flipside of his mountain. "Double-O-Dahlmer" lives in isolation also, and follows a rigid daily routine, which includes stalking and lying in wait for boys who stray from the village. Once his prey is lured to his cave, "Double-O-Dahlmer" feeds his needs by sexually dominating the boys and then mechanically dismembering them. He keeps their body parts in his refrigerator. "Double-O-Dahlmer" is a "cold-blooded, emotionless killer." "Double-O-Dahlmer" is also a Komodo Dragon.

Komodo Dragons are suspected to be the closest of living reptiles that may resemble one of the carnivorous mammal-like reptiles that gave us our proto-reptilian brain. Komodo Dragon hatchlings take to the trees as soon as possible to avoid being cannibalized by adult Dragons. Remember this, for it will take on symbolic meaning later.

All of these behaviors originate in impulses at the reptilian brain or lower in the body, and are modified by the "higher" brains. The reptilian brain is a powerful source of human behavior - primarily because it is hidden. It is deceptive. It is a secret from our conscious. But we do "know" it emotionally, intuitively. It is the slithering serpent in darkness! It is The Unconscious. Zairian saying: "If you kill a snake, you’re still afraid of it."

(And this subconscious "secrecy" manifests physically as the Illuminati secrecy which has been unfolding an agenda for thousands of years while the people have remained oblivious of its existence. But because we are in the closing years of the current energy cycle, our sub-conscious is becoming conscious. As it does so, its physical expression (the Illuminati agenda) also becomes conscious and that is one key reason why the agenda is now being exposed for the first time on this scale. It is a process that cannot be stopped. Sorry, Henry, mate, the game is up because the veil is up.)
Isopraxic refers to behavior in which two or more individuals engage in the same kind of activity. It cannot be overemphasized that isopraxis is basic to maintaining the identity of a species or a social group. The human fetus is in a perpetual dream-state (reptilian mentality). Newborn babies spend more than half their sleep time in REM dreamstate.
In earliest childhood, our mental state is controlled almost completely by the reptilian brain (along with the later evolved paleomammalian brain and the right hemisphere of the neocortex - the left hemisphere is underdeveloped in earliest childhood).

There is a striking correlation between penile and clitoral erection during dreamstate, even without sexual dream content. Why? In the reptilian brain, sex and aggression and territoriality are the same.

(This is one outstanding reason why the Illuminati are so obsessed with sex and, in particular, violent sex, as exposed in my books and those of victims of this like Cathy O’Brien (Trance Formation Of America), Arizona Wilder (Revelations of a Mother Goddess) and gathering numbers of others.)

28 June 2012

Forbidden Archeology - Secret Discoveries of Early Man

The creators of the Emmy Award Winning 'Mystery of the Sphinx' present a revolutionary new film that examines one of our greatest mysteries: Man's origins. Hosted by Charlton Heston, this film challenges what we are being taught about human evolution and the rise of early civilization. A new breed of scientific investigators present startling evidence that the academic community has quietly ignored.

27 June 2012

Piggies Squeal as Illuminati Tighten Noose

Hard to feel sorry for people who forfeit control of the economy to a foreign cartel consisting of satanist families.

"Economic crises have been produced by us for the goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation."
-- Protocols of Zion, 20

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Stock markets have been in free fall since last Wednesday when Ben Bernanke indicated the Fed would not trigger more "quantitative easing."

He would not inject more currency (credit) into the US economy. Credit is the oxygen that makes the economy sizzle or fizzle.

Oil and other commodities are cratering while gold is treading water, trying to make up its mind.

Had Bernanke said he was injecting another $500 billion into the economy, the market would have soared and everyone would be partying instead of ripping their garments.

It's hard to feel sorry for people who forfeit control over their monetary policy to a foreign private cartel of satanist families.

All our so-called leaders are agents of this cartel. Our mass media and cultural leaders are owned by them. Acquiescence in their fraud is a prerequisite for professional advancement.

This fraud has spawned all the others: the two world wars, the Great Depression, the Cold war etc. The people have been easily duped and played their roles.

We have forfeited our freedom for a good feed. Now we're discovering that we're the dinner.

There should be no such thing as "sovereign debt." Currency (credit) is just a medium of exchange like a coupon. Governments can create as much as they need debt-free to make the economy hum. Markets will determine their value relative to other currencies.

But the Illuminati bankers have created all currency in the form of a debt to them. Our society is wholly complicit in this fraud.

It is not Greek or German or French or Spanish banks that are getting the bailouts. They all got the virtual "money" from the Illuminati families. The banks are just a front for these families.

These families don't need the "money" back. It was created out of thin air. This is just a mechanism for plundering what's left.

The taxpayers of these countries are being saddled with this fictional debt and becoming debt slaves.

By accepting this fraud, they are enslaving themselves. The Illuminati bankers instigated 9-11 as a pretext to erect the prison walls.


As we have seen, the Cabalist Jewish bankers (the Illuminati) have a long-range plan for the ascendance of their "Messiah." Actually the anti-Christ, he will be "the King of the Jews" to be selected from the House of Rothschild. Most Jews are not privy to this plan.

The Illuminati Jews realized it will not happen by itself. The first step was the re-establishment of the State of Israel. The Rothschilds did this by colonizing Palestine and engineering the Dreyfus Affair and Nazism.

Now, the Rothschilds will bend the nations to their will by means of debt. Moses relates the basic principle in Deuteronomy 15:6: "Thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shalt not reign over thee."

The book, Elijah, Rothschilds & the Ark of the Covenant continues: "Note that this is not a suggestion given in the Scriptures. It is a command from the God of Israel. Lending upon usury is how to possess the land." (175)

"Lending on interest for consumer and emergency needs became a virtual Jewish monopoly in Western Europe between the 12th and 15th centuries...As security, real estate was most preferred. In this way Jews acquired in pledge houses, vineyards, farms, villages, castles, towns, and even provinces. " (177)

"The rise of absolute monarchies in Central Europe brought numbers of Jews into the influential position of negotiating loans for the various royal courts. The phenomenon of court Jews now continued into Europe. The nost famous included Lehmann, Oppenheimer and Goldschmidt in Germany and Austria." (180)

"Jean Izolulet, a member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universeile wrote in 1932: 'The meaning of history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all masters of lodges, rule the world." (183)

"Vatican City came under Rothschild influence in the early 19th century...Pope John Paul II admitted the Roman Catholic Church is still tied to the Rothschilds...In Sept 1979, the Pope revealed the Church had $50 billion invested in various Rothschild banks..." (191)


We have the dubious honor of witnessing the consummation of a centuries-old plan for world tyranny based on satanic megalomania and demented Biblical prophesies.

The Illuminati could not succeed without our determined self-deception and collaboration. Humanity is infected by a death wish.

Our would-be masters are proving that we are too venal, craven and stupid to be prosperous and free. They have ensured humanity will miss its Divine Rendezvous. However, there is still hope for some individuals.

24 June 2012

The [ALIEN] Matrix

“Let me tell you why you’re here…
You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You felt it your entire life; that there’s something very wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is—but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad…”
Morpheus from, “The Matrix”

The hideous events of September 11, 2001, that remain an unhealed wound in our collective national psyche, compel me to pause in sober reflection to reconsider the haunting riddle of human existence. Whether an insane terrorist attack or cruel conspiracy plot really doesn’t matter–either way its still an act of homicidal madness…!

Is this as good as it gets? What makes humans the way we are?

Are we truly the pinnacle of cosmic evolution? Did some unfathomable creation labor billions of years to fashion an incredible assembly of DNA spirals just so they might go shopping at Wal-Mart? Or watch “American Idol”? Or die of starvation in Somalia?

Is our species an absurd random collision of molecules that has somehow bumbled into a walking, talking mass of carbon atoms that mindlessly multiply and infest this little lost planet?

And as creatures who now fancy themselves to possess such a lofty measure of intellect, why can’t we muster sufficient reason to curb our chronic, barbaric behavior?

As a child of the late 1940s, I was assured that World War II was the ‘war-to-end-all-wars’, and yet to this day our nation remains engaged in the latest of a long cavalcade of mindless, murderous conflicts. Why? How do we account for humanity’s chronic addiction to self-destruction?

Author William Bramley grappled with these same perplexing issues by writing “The Gods of Eden”. And his research led him to discover the astounding inference that a significant link to the mystery of human evil might be hidden within the UFO enigma…

“Human beings appear to be a slave race languishing on an isolated planet in a small galaxy. As such, the human race was once a source of labor for an extraterrestrial civilization and still remains a possession today. To keep control over its possession and to maintain Earth as something of a prison, that other civilization has bred never-ending conflict between human beings, has promoted spiritual decay, and has erected on Earth conditions of unremitting physical hardship. This situation has existed for thousands of years and it continues today.”

“In the clay, god and man
Shall be bound, to a unity together;
So that to the end of days
The flesh and the soul
Which in a god have ripened—
That soul in a blood kinship be bound.”
(From Sumerian text.)

(“The Gods of Eden”, by William Bramley, Avon Books, 1989.)

And William Bramley is not alone. A host of other researchers are discovering the extraterrestrial influences in human behavior…

On May 10, 1971, the noted British Astrophysicist and Astronomer, Sir Fred Hoyle called a news conference and made the following, startling announcement:

“Human beings are simply pawns in a great game, being played by alien minds, which control mankind’s every move…

“These alien minds come from another universe, one with five dimensions…”

“These super-intelligent entities are so different from us that to apprehend them or to describe them in human terms, is impossible…”

“They have been here for countless eons and they have probably controlled the evolution of Homo-sapiens. All of what man has built and become was accomplished because of the ‘tinkering’ of these intelligent forces.”

As human inhabitants of planet Earth we might reasonably assume that any possible threat or menace from outer space would be represented by a warlike alien race descending from the skies to conquer new territories. All down through the history of our species, wars and conflicts have commonly precipitated over territorial disputes, so it would quite naturally follow that such disputes could arise between rival civilizations across the vastness of space.
However, what if the human species itself, rather than the planet, was the coveted object of alien invasion? What if the life force of each and every individual human on the planet was the most highly prized food source in the universe—like the ‘spice’ of Frank Herbert’s classic novel “Dune”—to be cultivated and harvested like an agricultural crop?

“The Spice MUST flow!”

What if such an alien invasion already occurred thousands of years ago on this planet, by a species from beyond our dimension of perception, and the day to day life we humans now live is merely a ‘construct’ or alien invention to keep us occupied, distracted, entertained while we live out our banal existence oblivious that our entire world is little more than a cattle ‘feed lot’?

What if the human life force or ‘soul’ energy was the precious commodity jealously sought by invading malevolent, alien parasites. And imagine the irony of discovering that our ruling elite’s obsessive passion to build a One-World-Order; was little more than to guarantee a perpetual harvesting source of this energy! A cruel cosmic farce where humans of privilege and high office are duped and seduced into assisting their alien masters with the demise of their own fellow creatures!

Yet, perhaps there is hope. Consider this text from “Extra-terrestrial Friends and Foes”, by George C. Andrews,(Illuminet Press, 1993.)

“…other-dimensional predatory parasites…have been manipulating us as we manipulate cattle since time immemorial. Their hypnotic control over us is so complete that hardly anyone even begins to realize that they actually exist. But just as one can take effective measures to rid oneself of a tapeworm, when one realizes what the problem is, so humanity now has the opportunity to rid itself of these other-dimensional extraterrestrial parasites. An ever-increasingly widespread realization of the true nature of this predatory game is what will bring about liberation.”

Actually the growing obsession to establish a One-World-Order, suggests an imminent threat to the harvesting operation already in play here. The imperative for control is ‘out-of-control’ suggesting perhaps a disruptive shift in human consciousness or perceptions that makes former inducements of control less effective, precipitating a growing necessity to impose more stringent artificial inducements. Yet more and more, the secret alien-control scam is being revealed…


In 1991 a young physicist named Robert Lazar revealed publicly he had been employed at the famed Area-51 super secret military test center in Nevada. Lazar claimed he had actually worked on a captured ‘alien’ disc, one of nine hidden at a remote facility within Area 51, called S-4. The captured disc Lazar called the ‘sport model’ was still functional and came from the star system of Reticulum, thirty-seven light years from earth. Lazar learned the craft originally belonged to aliens referred to as the ‘Grays’.
In addition, Lazar was shown a briefing document, which allegedly outlined the history of the Gray’s involvement with Earth humanity that suggests a clue to their proprietary interest in human physiology.

“These beings [EBENS] said that they had been visiting Earth for a long time and presented photographic evidence which they contended was over ten thousand years old. There was an exchange of hardware and information in central Nevada until 1979 at which time there was a conflict which brought the program to an abrupt halt.”

“These beings conveyed information about the capability of effecting the human brain to anesthetize the human body. This is done without any physical contact from a remote source. For this anesthesia to be accomplished, the brain has to be in a relaxed state similar to that required for hypnosis. If the brain is subject to any external stimulation, like stimulant drugs or loud music, this manipulation of the nervous system is ineffective.
These beings said that man was the product of externally corrected evolution. They said that man as a species had been genetically altered sixty-five times. They referred to humans as ‘containers’, yet I don’t know what we’re containers of.”

If the grays function as “wranglers” here on the planet Earth “cattle ranch”, what exactly do we humans ‘contain’ for them to harvest?

Once again, George C. Andrews may offer the answer…

“One of the allegations concerning the short Grays is that they have a way of deriving nourishment from what leaves our bodies at the moment of death, that they are eaters of souls, who extract from our spirits a certain principle, through a process comparable to the extraction of hemoglobin from blood, which they use as food, burying the residue elsewhere in the universe, not on this planet.”

“Separation of the etheric body from the soul can also be brought about by malignant entities for predatory purposes, both during life and upon passing into the frontiers into death.”

“The etheric body is charged with energy that is neither as subtle as that of the soul, nor a coarse as that of the physical body, but is intermediate between them. This is a substance highly valued as nourishment by certain other life-forms, which include the Grays. That is what the Grays are after, which they are here to trap as we trap fur-bearing animals. We are now and have for millennia been used by the Grays as a food source, with almost zero awareness of the actual situation. However, the continued survival of the Grays on Earth depends on our continued ignorance of this symbiotic relationship, in which the benefits are strictly one-way.”

“Because of religious conditioning before death, the spirit of the deceased voluntarily approaches a symbol in its path, which is actually a camouflaged instrument that magnetically captures the etheric body, laden with the individual’s life-experience. After having been separated from its etheric body, the soul no longer has any memory of its previous lifetime’s experience, and thus reincarnates again remembering nothing, as it begins to accumulate another body of vital experience. The process goes on and on indefinitely, providing nourishment for the Grays, but paralyzing our evolutionary development by denying us access to the hard-earned wisdom and knowledge gained by experience during our past lives.”

“The Grays are other-dimensional predatory parasites, who have been manipulating us as we manipulate cattle since time immemorial. Their hypnotic control over us is so complete that hardly anyone even begins to realize that they actually exist. But just as one can take effective measures to rid oneself of a tapeworm, when one realizes what the problem is, so humanity now has the opportunity to rid itself of these other-dimensional extraterrestrial parasites. An ever-increasingly widespread realization of the true nature of this predatory game is what will bring about our liberation. The moment each individual realizes that he or she has a direct personal private line to the Source of All, organized religion becomes obsolete and the etheric body eludes capture, because it no longer seeks a symbol, or middle-man, but accompanies the soul straight back to where it came from: God, the Source of All.”

According to the notorious UFO myth, President Dwight Eisenhower signed a treaty with the grays at MUROC air base in 1954, to exchange human genetic material for advanced technologies. In the book “The Day After Roswell”, retired Army Col. Philip Corso, former National Security Advisor to President Eisenhower, revealed secret interaction with these creatures was more than just a political expedience…

“We were convinced that whoever the UFO extraterrestrials were, they were tampering with our planet, operating with impudence, and manipulating us constantly and secretly.
But it was a secret that had our full compliance because we were unwilling to admit the truth and fight the war. Those of us in the military who knew what was happening also felt that we could be experiencing an invasion that was more of an infiltration.
They were compromising our very systems of defense and government…”

“As long as we were incapable of defending ourselves, we had to allow [the ETs] to intrude as they wished… We had negotiated a kind of surrender with them as long as we couldn’t fight them. They dictated the terms because they knew what we most feared was disclosure. Hide the truth and the truth becomes your ENEMY. Disclose the truth and it becomes your weapon. We hid the truth and the [extraterrestrials] used it against us…”

[“The Day After Roswell”, by Col. Philip J. Corso & William Birnes, Pocket Books, 1997.]


In 1945, an earthenware jar was dug up in a cave west of the Nile near the village of Nag Hammadi, Egypt. Contained in this jar were papyrus scrolls and codices wrapped in leather of Biblical texts dating back to around 400 AD.Translations of these ‘Nag Hammadi’ Scrolls revealed a body of early Christian teachings that are considered to be ‘Gnostic’ in character. Yet contained within these lost texts is an exotic description of the origins of Earth and the human species that serious religious scholars dismiss as mythological ‘science-fiction’—a fantastic and disturbing description of cosmology that reveals an intrusion upon Earth humanity by malevolent, parasitic extraterrestrial invaders, who use Earth humans as puppets in a vast, centuries old game of deception and domination.

And how do the Gnostic texts describe these ‘invaders’? Referred to as “Archons”, they come in two distinct types—an aggressive reptilian humanoid and smaller, passive creatures resembling a ‘prematurely formed fetus’!

The astounding research into Gnostic mystery teachings by author, John Lash in his extraordinary book “Not In His Image”, may hold the key to unlocking the riddle of ancient Extraterrestrial interaction and interference with human evolution…

“Bizarre as it may seem, a solution to the most baffling enigma of our time was fully elucidated in sacred writings almost two thousand years ago. In the matter of the ET/UFO enigma, the Gnostics were ahead of everyone today. Way ahead…”

“Archons are an alien force that intrudes subliminally upon the human mind and deviates our intelligence away from its proper and sane applications. They make us play out our inhumane behavior to weird and violent extremes…”

“Archons are psycho-spiritual parasites… Gnostics detected the humanized face of the Archons in all authoritarian structures and systems that deny authenticity and self-determination to the individual.”

[“Not In His Image”, by John Lash, Chelsea Green Publishing Co. 2006]

The roots of Gnosticism reach far back to the ‘mystery schools’ of ancient Egypt, yet halfway around the world, this same awareness of the Archons could be traced to the mystic seers of Ancient Mexico as well…


“We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don’t do so…indeed we are held prisoner!

They took us over because we are food to them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. Just as we rear chickens in coops, the predators rear us in human coops, humaneros. Therefore, their food is always available to them.

Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain the contradictions between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of belief, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior. Sorcerers believe that the predators have given us our systems of beliefs, our ideas of good and evil; our social mores. They are the ones who set up our dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed, and cowardice. It is the predator who makes us complacent, routinary, and ego-maniacal.

In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous maneuver—stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist; a horrendous maneuver from the point of those who suffer it. They gave us their mind. The predators’ mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now.

I know that even now, though you never have suffered hunger… you have food anxiety, which is none other than the anxiety of the predator who fears that at any moment now its maneuver is going to be uncovered and food is going to be denied. Through the mind, which, after all is their mind, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. And they insure, in this manner, a degree of security to act as a buffer against their fear.

Sorcerers of ancient Mexico…reasoned that man must have been a complete being at one point, with stupendous insights, feats of awareness that are mythological legends nowadays. And then, everything seems to disappear, and we have now a sedated man. What I’m saying is that what we have against us not a simple predator. It is very smart, and organized. It follows a methodical system to render us useless. Man, the magical being that he is destined to be, is no longer magical. He’s an average piece of meat.

There are no more dreams for man but the dreams of an animal who is being raised to be a piece of meat: trite, conventional, imbecilic.”

[“The Active Side of Infinity” by Carlos Castaneda, HarperCollins; 1st edition, 1998.]


The notion that our everyday ‘reality’ is a construct or worse–a holding pen for ‘cattle’ is graphically portrayed in the Warner Brothers film, “The Matrix”. More than unfathomable science fiction, does this movie contain profoundly insightful metaphors that actually describe the plight of contemporary human existence?

Judge the wisdom of ‘Morpheus’ as he explains “The Matrix” to ‘Neo’…

“Let me tell you why you’re here.
You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You felt it your entire life; that there’s something very wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is—but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I’m talking about?”

“The Matrix?”

“Do you want to know what it is? The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us, even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.”

“What truth?”

“That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch—a prison for your mind. Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is—you have to see it for yourself . . .

“The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside, you look around, and what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters; the very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it.”
(“The Matrix”, Warner Brothers motion pictures, 1999.)

Ah, but Morpheus has not been the only movie character over the years to discover the ‘Matrix’—consider the insights of Moby Dick’s relentless nemesis, Captain Ahab…

“Look ye, Starbuck, all visible objects are but pasteboard masks. Some inscrutable, yet reasoning thing puts forth the molding of their features. The white whale tasks me—he heaps me, yet he is but a mask. ‘Tis the thing behind the mask I chiefly hate; the malignant thing that has plagued and frightened man since time began. The thing that maws and mutilates our race, not killing us outright but letting us live on with half a heart and half a lung.”
(“Moby Dick”, Warner Brothers’ motion pictures, 1956.)

Then in 1957, Robert Mitchum as the captain of a World War II Navy destroyer locked in a deadly duel with a Nazi U-boat, thoughtfully observed:

“We’ve learned a hard truth . . . that there’s no end to misery and destruction. You cut the head off the snake and it grows another one. You cut that one off and you find another. You can’t kill it because it’s something within our selves. You can call it the enemy if you want to, but it’s part of us—we’re all men.”
(“The Enemy Below”, 20th Century Fox motion pictures 1957)  

The first step to liberation from this alien control is to unmask the deception. Our ancestors fully understood this truth 3600 years ago. The stupendous success of this alien invasion has been its ability to function in absolute secrecy and seduce the human mind with artificial systems of beliefs; to convince us that we live our lives at the mercy of circumstances and events that exist outside of ourselves. For centuries this belief, like an insidious mantra, has been drilled relentlessly into our psyches from the cradle to the grave, We have been duped into seeing ourselves as victims and so we become victims.

In her book, “Bringers of the Dawn”, Barbara Marciniak’s channeled Pleiadian source reveals that in times long past humans were fully aware and cognizant of their true ‘spiritual’ identity and heritage. However, over the vast span of ages, our enlightened race fell victim to marauding extra-terrestrials who invaded our world and gained control over the human population…

“The ultimate tyranny in a society is not control by martial law. It is the control by the psychological manipulation of consciousness, through which, reality is defined so that those who exist within it do not even realize that they are in prison…

You have been controlled like sheep in a pen by those who think they own you–from the government, to the world management team to those in space…”

Understand that you create your own reality and that every other person creates their reality. Everyone has the opportunity to wake up at any time.

When enough people create their own reality–consciously create it–you will create a new planet…

We have said to you that your lesson is authority–to become your own authority and stop giving over your power of decision making to governmental people or parents or teachers or gods. It is time for the people of Earth to become sovereign.”

[“Bringers of the Dawn”; by Barbara Marciniak, Bear & Company Publishing, 1992.]

Ultimately as the character ‘Neo’ in “The Matrix” discovered the key to liberation must be found within ourselves…

Neo: “I know you’re out there. I can feel you now. I know that you’re afraid… you’re afraid of us. You’re afraid of change. I don’t know the future. I didn’t come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it’s going to begin. I’m going to hang up this phone, and then I’m going to show these people what you don’t want them to see. I’m going to show them a world without you. A world without rules and controls, without borders or boundaries. A world where anything is possible. Where we go from there is a choice I leave to you.”


23 June 2012

The Four Great Errors of Humankind

The error of confusing cause and effect. There is no more dangerous error than that of mistaking the effect for the cause: I call it the real corruption of reason. Yet this error belongs among the most ancient and recent habits of mankind: it is even hallowed among us and goes by the name of “religion” or “morality.” Every single sentence which religion and morality formulate contains it; priests and legislators of moral codes are the originators of this corruption of reason.
I give an example. Everybody knows the book of the famous Cornaro in which he recommends his slender diet as a recipe for a long and happy life—a virtuous one too. Few books have been read so much; even now thousands of copies are sold in England every year. I do not doubt that scarcely any book (except the Bible, as is meet) has done as much harm, has shortened as many lives, as this well-intentioned curiosum. The reason: the mistaking of the effect for the cause. The worthy Italian thought his diet was the cause of his long life, whereas the precondition for a long life, the extraordinary slowness of his metabolism, the consumption of so little, was the cause of his slender diet. He was not free to eat little or much; his frugality was not a matter of “free will”: he became sick when he ate more. But whoever is no carp not only does well to eat properly, but needs to. A scholar in our time, with his rapid consumption of nervous energy, would simply destroy himself with Cornaro’s diet. Crede experto. [Believe him who has tried.]

The most general formula on which every religion and morality is founded is: “Do this and that, refrain from this and that—then you will be happy! Otherwise...” Every morality, every religion, is this imperative; I call it the great original sin of reason, the immortal unreason. In my mouth, this formula is changed into its opposite—first example of my “revaluation of all values”: a well-turned-out human being, a “happy one,” must perform certain actions and shrinks instinctively from other actions; he carries the order, which he represents physiologically, into his relations with other human beings and things. In a formula: his virtue is the effect of his happiness. A long life, many descendants—these are not the wages of virtue: rather virtue itself is that slowing down of the metabolism which leads, among other things, also to a long life, many descendants—in short, to Cornarism.
The church and morality say: “A generation, a people, are destroyed by license and luxury.” My recovered reason says: when a people approaches destruction, when it degenerates physiologically, then license and luxury follow from this (namely, the craving for ever stronger and more frequent stimulation, as every exhausted nature knows it). This young man turns pale early and wilts; his friends say: that is due to this or that disease. I say: that he became diseased, that he did not resist the disease, was already the effect of an impoverished life or hereditary exhaustion. The newspaper reader says: this party destroys itself by making such a mistake. My higher politics says: a party which makes such mistakes has reached its end; it has lost its sureness of instinct. Every mistake in every sense is the effect of the degeneration of instinct, of the disintegration of the will: one could almost define what is bad in this way. All that is good is instinct—and hence easy, necessary, free. Laboriousness is an objection: the god is typically different from the hero. (In my language: light feet are the first attribute of divinity.)

The error of a false causality. People have believed at all times that they knew what a cause is; but whence did we take our knowledge—or more precisely, our faith—that we had such knowledge? From the realm of the famous “inner facts,” of which not a single one has so far proved to be factual. We believed ourselves to be causal in the act of willing: we thought that here at least we caught causality in the act. Nor did one doubt that all the antecedents of an act, its causes, were to be sought in consciousness and would be found there once sought—as “motives”: else one would not have been free and responsible for it. Finally, who would have denied that a thought is caused? that the ego causes the thought?
Of these three “inward facts” which seem to guarantee causality, the first and most persuasive is that of the will as cause. The conception of a consciousness ("spirit") as a cause, and later also that of the ego as cause (the “subject"), are only afterbirths: first the causality of the will was firmly accepted as given, as empirical.
Meanwhile we have thought better of it. Today we no longer believe a word of all this. The “inner world” is full of phantoms and will-o'-the-wisps: the will is one of them. The will no longer moves anything, hence does not explain anything either—it merely accompanies events; it can also be absent. The so-called motive: another error. Merely a surface phenomenon of consciousness, something alongside the deed that is more likely to cover up the antecedents of the deeds than to represent them. And as for the ego! That has become a fable, a fiction, a play on words: it has altogether ceased to think, feel, or will!
What follows from this? There are no mental causes at all. The whole of the allegedly empirical evidence for that has gone to the devil. That is what follows! And what a fine abuse we had perpetrated with this "empirical evidence"; we created the world on this basis as a world of causes, a world of will, a world of spirits. The most ancient and enduring psychology was at work here and did not do anything else: all that happened was considered a doing, all doing the effect of a will; the world became to it a multiplicity of doers; a doer (a “subject") was slipped under all that happened. It was out of himself that man projected his three “inner facts"—that in which he believed most firmly: the will, the spirit, the ego. He even took the concept of being from the concept of the ego; he posited “things” as “being,” in his image, in accordance with his concept of the ego as a cause. Small wonder that later he always found in things only that which he gad put into them. The thing itself, to say it once more, the concept of thing is a mere reflex of the faith in the ego as cause. And even your atom, my dear mechanists and physicists—how much error, how much rudimentary psychology is still residual in your atom! Not to mention the "thing-in-itself,” the horrendum pudendum of the metaphysicians! The error of the spirit as cause mistaken for reality! And made the very measure of reality! And called God!

The error of imaginary causes. To begin with dreams: ex post facto, a cause is slipped under a particular sensation (for example, one following a far-off cannon shot)—often a whole little novel in which the dreamer turns up as the protagonist. The sensation endures meanwhile in a kind of resonance: it waits, as it were, until the causal instinct permits it to step into the foreground—now no longer as a chance occurrence, but as “meaning.” The cannon shot appears in a causal mode, in an apparent reversal of time. What is really later, the motivation, is experienced first—often with a hundred details which pass like lightning and the shot follows. What has happened? The representations which were produced by a certain state have been misunderstood as its causes.
In fact, we do the same thing when awake. Most of our general feelings—every kind of inhibition, pressure, tension, and explosion in the play and counterplay of our organs, and particularly the state of the nervus sympaticus—excite our causal instinct: we want to have a reason for feeling this way or that—for feeling bad or for feeling good. We are never satisfied merely to state the fact that we feel this way or that: we admit this fact only—become conscious of it only—when we have furnished some kind of motivation. Memory, which swings into action in such cases, unknown to us, brings up earlier states of the same kind, together with the causal interpretations associated with them—not their real causes. The faith, to be sure, that such representations, such accompanying conscious processes are the causes is also brought forth by memory. Thus originates a habitual acceptance of a particular causal interpretation, which, as a matter of fact, inhibits any investigation into the real cause—even precludes it.

The psychological explanation of this. To derive something unknown from something familiar relieves, comforts, and satisfies, besides giving a feeling of power. With the unknown, one is confronted with danger, discomfort, and care; the first instinct is to abolish these painful states. First principle: any explanation is better than none. Since at bottom it is merely a matter of wishing to be rid of oppressive representations, one is not too particular about the means of getting rid of them: the first representation that explains the unknown as familiar feels so good that one “considers it true.” The proof of pleasure ("of strength") as a criterion of truth.
The causal instinct is thus conditional upon, and excited by, the feeling of fear. The “why?” shall, if at all possible, not give the cause for its own sake so much as for a particular kind of cause—a cause that is comforting, liberating, and relieving. That it is something already familiar, experienced, and inscribed in the memory, which is posited as a cause, that is the first consequence of this need. That which is new and strange and has not been experienced before, is excluded as a cause. Thus one searches not only for some kind of explanation to serve as a cause, but for a particularly selected and preferred kind of explanation—that which has most quickly and most frequently abolished the feeling of the strange, new, and hitherto unexperienced: the most habitual explanations. Consequence: one kind of positing of causes predominates more and more, is concentrated into a system and finally emerges as dominant, that is, as simply precluding other causes and explanations. The banker immediately thinks of "business,” the Christian of “sin,” and the girl of her love.

The whole realm of morality and religion belongs under this concept of imaginary causes. The “explanation” of disagreeable general feelings. They are produced by beings that are hostile to us (evil spirits: the most famous case—the misunderstanding of the hysterical as witches). They are produced by acts which cannot be approved (the feeling of "sin,” of “sinfulness,” is slipped under a physiological discomfort; one always finds reasons for being dissatisfied with oneself). They are produced as punishments, as payment for something we should not have done, for what we should not have been (impudently generalized by Schopenhauer into a principle in which morality appears as what it really is—as the very poisoner and slanderer of life: “Every great pain, whether physical or spiritual, declares what we deserve; for it could not come to us if we did not deserve it.” World as Will and Representation II, 666). They are produced as effects of ill-considered actions that turn out badly. (Here the affects, the senses, are posited as causes, as “guilty"; and physiological calamities are interpreted with the help of other calamities as “deserved.")
The “explanation” of agreeable general feelings. They are produced by trust in God. They are produced by the consciousness of good deeds (the so-called “good conscience"—a physiological state which at times looks so much like good digestion that it is hard to tell them apart). They are produced by the successful termination of some enterprise (a naive fallacy: the successful termination of some enterprise does not by any means give a hypochondriac or a Pascal agreeable general feelings). They are produced by faith, charity, and hope—the Christian virtues.
In truth, all these supposed explanations are resultant states and, as it were, translations of pleasurable or unpleasurable feelings into a false dialect: one is in a state of hope because the basic physiological feeling is once again strong and rich; one trusts in God because the feeling of fullness and strength gives a sense of rest. Morality and religion belong altogether to the psychology of error: in every single case, cause and effect are confused; or truth is confused with the effects of believing something to be true; or a state of consciousness is confused with its causes.

The error of free will. Today we no longer have any pity for the concept of “free will”: we know only too well what it really is—the foulest of all theologians’ artifices aimed at making mankind "responsible” in their sense, that is, dependent upon them. Here I simply supply the psychology of all “making responsible.”
Wherever responsibilities are sought, it is usually the instinct of wanting to judge and punish which is at work. Becoming has been deprived of its innocence when any being-such-and-such is traced back to will, to purposes, to acts of responsibility: the doctrine of the will has been invented essentially for the purpose of punishment, that is, because one wanted to impute guilt. The entire old psychology, the psychology of will, was conditioned by the fact that its originators, the priests at the head of ancient communities, wanted to create for themselves the right to punish—or wanted to create this right for God. Men were considered “free” so that they might be judged and punished—so that they might become guilty: consequently, every act had to be considered as willed, and the origin of every act had to be considered as lying within the consciousness (and thus the most fundamental counterfeit in psychologicis was made the principle of psychology itself).
Today, as we have entered into the reverse movement and we immoralists are trying with all our strength to take the concept of guilt and the concept of punishment out of the world again, and to cleanse psychology, history, nature, and social institutions and sanctions of them, there is in our eyes no more radical opposition than that of the theologians, who continue with the concept of a “moral world-order” to infect the innocence of becoming by means of "punishment” and “guilt.” Christianity is a metaphysics of the hangman.

What alone can be our doctrine? That no one gives man his qualities—neither God, nor society, nor his parents and ancestors, nor he himself. (The nonsense of the last idea was taught as “intelligible freedom” by Kant—perhaps by Plato already.) No one is responsible for man’s being there at all, for his being such-and-such, or for his being in these circumstances or in this environment. The fatality of his essence is not to be disentangled from the fatality of all that has been and will be. Man is not the effect of some special purpose, of a will, an end; nor is he the object of an attempt to attain an “ideal of humanity” or an “ideal of happiness” or an “ideal of morality.” It is absurd to wish to devolve one’s essence on some end or other. We have invented the concept of “end”: in reality there is no end.
One is necessary, one is a piece of fatefulness, one belongs to the whole, one is in the whole; there is nothing which could judge, measure, compare, or sentence our being, for that would mean judging, measuring, comparing, or sentencing the whole. But there is nothing besides the whole. That nobody is held responsible any longer, that the mode of being may not be traced back to a causa prima, that the world does not form a unity either as a sensorium or as “spirit"—that alone is the great liberation; with this alone is the innocence of becoming restored. The concept of “God” was until now the greatest objection to existence. We deny God, we deny the responsibility in God: only thereby do we redeem the world.